Close Menu
Bedroom Producers Blog
  • Home
  • Favorites
    • Free VST
    • Free DAW
    • Free Autotune
    • The Best FREE Drum Kits (2024)
    • Music Software
    • Mixing Tips
  • Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • Gear
  • Samples
  • Downloads
  • News
    • Software News
    • Soundware News
    • Deals
Connect
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
Download
BPB Dirty VHS
BPB Dirty VHS (FREE VHS Tape Plugin)
BPB Dirty Filter Plus
BPB Dirty Filter Plus (FREE Dual Filter Distortion)
BPB Dirty LA
BPB Dirty LA (FREE Vintage Limiting Amplifier)
BPB Dirty Spring by Bedroom Producers Blog
BPB Dirty Spring (FREE Spring Reverb Plugin)
BPB Saturator by Bedroom Producers Blog
BPB Saturator (FREE Tube/Tape Saturation Plugin)
  • Free VST
  • Free DAW
  • Free Autotune
  • Music Software
  • Free Drums
  • Mixing Tips
YouTube Instagram Facebook X (Twitter) RSS
Bedroom Producers Blog
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • Gear
  • Samples
  • Downloads
  • News
    • Software News
    • Soundware News
    • Deals
SUBSCRIBE
Bedroom Producers Blog
You are at:Home»Reviews»T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection REVIEW (WINNER ANNOUNCED)
Reviews

T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection REVIEW (WINNER ANNOUNCED)

By James NugentDecember 6, 2021689 Comments9 Mins Read
IK Multimedia T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection REVIEW

If you’re going to emulate some legendary hardware, working with the original manufacturer is an excellent place to start. IK Multimedia put this collection together in collaboration with TASCAM for their 50th anniversary.

Read more in our IK Multimedia T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection review and enter the giveaway to win a FREE copy of the software.

Recreating the sound of vintage hardware in plugin form can be a thankless task at times. Some purists will tell you it sounds awful before they even hear it. Personally, I like to take each on individual merit; some are terrible, some are good, and now and then, some are remarkably good.

The TASCAM Tape Collection got my attention when it was announced, so I’m delighted to have the chance to check it out.

T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection – What’s in the Collection?

The collection features four vintage tape machines and has an introductory price of €129.99 (usually €199.99).

TEAC A-6100 MKII

The TEAC A-6100 MKII arrived on the scene in 1973 as one of the first tape machines made specifically for mastering.

It’s the most subtle of the four, and you have to make more significant adjustments to get more noticeable changes. It adds instant authenticity with the right amount of tape saturation and compression.

TEAC A-3340S

The 1972 A-3340S was the first four-track recorder that featured synchronized overdubbing.

When used with the 911 tape formulation, it delivers the definitive tape sound with saturation that can be warm or more aggressive when pushed.

TASCAM 388

The TASCAM 388 eight-track recorder came around in 1985.

Of the four, the 388 provides the most comprehensive scope for creative tweaking, thanks largely to the three-band EQ.

TASCAM Porta One

The four-track TASCAM Porta One MiniStudio looks and sounds like the 80s/90s.

I’m not just bundling two decades of sound together, but I’m talking about that boombox image. It makes me think of movies like Do the Right Thing, and it’s great on Hip Hop, New Jack Swing, etc.

IK Multimedia says TEAC and TASCAM selected the most sought-after models from their history, which is no surprise. They then sourced the most pristine example of each unit available and fully restored them to factory specification.

Spectrasonics did a similar thing on a larger scale with 36 vintage keyboard instruments for Keyscape.

The behavior and performance of vintage gear aren’t always consistent from one unit to another, so multiple hardware owners could have slightly different expectations of how something should sound. What I like most about this collection is that it starts with the sound and performance that the manufacturer intended all those years ago.

Having the original manufacturer’s seal of approval doesn’t guarantee success, but it certainly doesn’t hurt.

Using T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection

The first thing to note is that you can open these plugins inside the T-Racks 5 shell or individually in your DAW.

As far as image goes, I think these plugins look great, and that’s pretty common with IK Multimedia. Good looks aren’t essential, but when a plugin looks clunky or has a strange/tedious layout, it becomes less appealing to use; these GUIs are fully resizable too, which is always nice.

The layout of each plugin follows the design of the original tape machines pretty closely, minus a few adjustments for plugin form. Each plugin also shares the same set of controls, with just a few slight differences.

The shared controls allow you to quickly become more confident with all four plugins, especially for users new to tape machine plugins. Instead of struggling with too many controls, you can focus on how each plugin sounds and reacts.

The TEAC machines have Record and Play sections, the TASCAM machines have Record and EQ sections, including some of the most important controls.

In the Record sections, you’ll find Bias, Level, and HF EQ. In conjunction with the main Input, these three controls let you bring out varied effects of the recording head. Pushing the Record Level will result in more obvious saturation, and the HF EQ can either highlight or compensate for the loss of high-frequency content with magnetic tape recorders.

The Bias is a bit more interesting; generally, Bias on a tape machine provides optimal fidelity through a more linear magnetic transfer. Increasing the Bias will typically produce a warmer sound with more saturation; reducing it will typically enhance any non-linear effects like distortion.

You don’t have to adjust the Bias, but it’s something that is often used exaggeratedly.

There is an Input/Repro switch that determines whether your signal goes through the whole analog recording system or just the electronic input/output stages. I can see why people might like both options, with Input being more transparent.

YouTube video

But, for me, I doubt I’d stray from Repro because you can still be subtle without losing any of the tape machine processes.

I love the EQ in the Record and Play stages; even if they are subtle, you can do a lot of fine-tuning, avoiding the need for another plugin.

The TASCAM Porta One has the same EQ as the TEAC models (Play), but the 388 has a three-band EQ with a wide frequency range.

True Stereo recreates the subtle variation between left and right channels that you’d expect from a tape machine. The variation isn’t overwhelmingly noticeable, but it’s part of the analog charm. You can disable it if you prefer to keep both channels identical.

Transport Modeling mimics the behavior of the mechanical transport, which increases the likelihood of very slight irregularities.

Features like True Stereo and Transport Modeling are amongst my favorite things about this collection.

I say that for a couple of reasons; firstly, it’s an example of how IK Multimedia modeled each part of these tape machines in great detail. It’s about recreating the interaction between those different parts that play a role in the final sound.

Secondly, when developers add such features, they sometimes exaggerate them as if that validates their inclusion more. When that happens, you end up with something that sounds false and gimmicky; that’s not the case here.

The Tape Speed is shown on each machine as Low and High, representing 7.5 and 15 inches per second (IPS), respectively. Setting the Tape Speed has a lot to do with the desired sound and the style of music in question. I prefer the Slow speed because it sounds warmer and less clinical, but the increased fidelity of the High speed works well, too, particularly with a more modern sound.

The TASCAM 388 has no Tape Speed controls.

Magic Formulas

There are five tape formulations in total. Each machine offers four of those formulations, with the selection varying from one machine to another. The TASCAM Porta One is the exception, which offers two cassette tape formulations (Type I and Type II). As a nice little aesthetically pleasing feature, you’ll see the tape change on the GUI when you select different formulations.

Here are the formulations and their defining characteristics:

  • 35 – Balance between precision and warmth of the TASCAM 388.
  • 911 – Balance between precision and warmth on the TEAC machines.
  • 456 – The most commonly used and definitive tape sound.
  • GP9 – Punchy and modern.
  • 499 – Analog sound with minimal distortion/compression and enhanced HF definition.

The impact of changing formulation depends on the machine you are using and how you have it set up. With default settings, the effect of changes is fairly minimal; you’ll hear it, but it’s not a drastic change. You notice a subtle but steady transition from a warmer or darker sound to a more open and modern sound as you cycle through the selections.

The two cassette tape types of the Porta One have more distinct characteristics. Type I (normal bias) has an apparent Lo-Fi sound, and Type II has a cleaner sound.

CPU-Unfriendly

I want to touch on this briefly because it’s to be expected. With many moving parts (processing), the trade-off is higher CPU usage; this is true of these plugins. It’s not going to cripple your project in any way, but you wouldn’t want to have too many instances running. Even if the CPU usage was far less, these plugins aren’t ones that you’d want all over everything in your mix anyway.

T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection – Final Thoughts

I don’t own any of these tape machines in hardware form, so I’m not making direct comparisons. I’ve heard people saying bluntly, it’s not as good as the real thing, and I’ll agree, that’s fine.

Without ever using a real TEAC A-6100 MkII, if offered the machine or the plugin, I’ll take the machine. However, I find it ridiculous that people who make it clear they are hardware-only purists take the time to comment so passionately on plugins; just don’t buy it.

Anyone who is open to software will know that emulations are getting better and better. The trouble isn’t so much creating a good sound; it’s mimicking the inconsistencies of an analog machine, and the relationship between each stage; that’s where I think IK has done a fantastic job.

I love how they sound, and I love that they aren’t as obvious/intrusive as many other tape emulations. I think they sound very close to the original units (as far as I can without owning one), and it’s fantastic when you add the convenience of a plugin (no maintenance, no flight case).

Even beyond the introductory price, the full price of €199.99 seems reasonable value for money to me for the collection. I mean, I wouldn’t mind if they reduced the price to, say, around FREE, but that’s stretching wishful thinking.

Plugins come in 64-bit AU, VST2, VST3, and AAX formats for macOS and Windows.

More info: T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection

The Giveaway

We are giving away a FREE copy of the T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection to one lucky BPB reader (thanks, IK Multimedia! ❤️).

To enter the giveaway, answer this question in the comments section: Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?

We will pick the winners using a random comment picker on Monday, November 29th.

The winner is: Nicolas Fournier: n********@gmail.com

Congratulations! :)

Everyone else, thanks for participating, and better luck next time. Thanks for reading BPB! :)

More articles:

  • Samplefino Analogue Drums Bundle Is FREE @ Bedroom Producers Blog
  • BPB Saturator Is A FREE Tube/Tape Saturation VST Plugin
  • Black Friday 2021 Deals (For Music Producers)
  • All BlueLab Audio Plugins Are Now FREE!

T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection Review

89%
89%
Awesome

We loved how T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection sounds, and we loved that the plugins aren't as obvious/intrusive as many other tape emulations.

64-bit Mac Windows
Avatar photo
James Nugent

James is a musician and writer from Scotland. An avid synth fan, sound designer, and coffee drinker. Sometimes found wandering around Europe with an MPC in hand.

689 Comments

  1. Ivo Seifert

    on November 22, 2021 3:11 pm

    No, I would not

    Reply
    • George B.

      on November 22, 2021 5:10 pm

      No, I don’t

      Reply
      • Daniel Velehov

        on November 22, 2021 10:31 pm

        No. I’d not.

        Reply
        • Brian

          on November 23, 2021 1:38 am

          As tempting as it is, the space requirements, control, and ease of digital wins for me.

          Reply
          • Rick

            on November 23, 2021 1:51 am

            Fully analog? I don’t think so in this day and age. I think a hybrid setup is the way to go!

            Reply
        • Matt Sullivan

          on November 29, 2021 4:40 am

          Honestly, a digital studio can be operated in a short amount of time through trial and error, tutorials, manuals and just plain dumb luck. The same cannot be said for an analog. Practice, training, money, calluses, blood, sweat, tears, years…The only way I would ever switch to analog is if i went back in time 20 years and started mastering the craft. Sadly, i just dont have the time for that anymore.

          Reply
      • xero kar

        on November 23, 2021 4:58 am

        No i don’t know how to use

        Reply
        • Ceban

          on November 23, 2021 11:14 am

          Non, je le remplacerai pas du à l avance technologique de plugin et l’optimisation de l’espace

          Reply
          • freesex

            on December 7, 2021 5:47 am

            Dude, don’t get me wrong but why do you answer in French when the comment’s in English? 🤨🤨

            Reply
      • Andre Summerville

        on November 23, 2021 1:49 pm

        I would just for the crisp sound and to be back when times was good and you have to learn from the best to be the best.

        Reply
      • Bruno Nascimento

        on November 24, 2021 12:38 am

        I definitely wouldn’t! Recall would be hell! 😱

        Reply
      • Jarrett York

        on November 27, 2021 4:37 am

        No, I would not. Simply due to lack of flexibility. However, I would love a dive into a hybrid set up.

        Reply
    • AlexC

      on November 22, 2021 5:17 pm

      No I would not

      Reply
      • Christopher Watson

        on November 22, 2021 10:49 pm

        Yes I do.

        Reply
        • Surya Nugraha

          on November 27, 2021 5:40 pm

          No, it would be great, but analog is expensive :)

          Reply
      • Jesse

        on November 23, 2021 1:06 am

        Sim e não…
        Sim pois analógico sempre vai ser analógico e o som é característico do equipamento…o timbre é o calor dele é é será único….

        Não pelo custo e manutenção hoje de certos equipamentos e os plug-ins soam tão bem quanto ao analógico…

        Reply
      • Peter Cliff Mugandani

        on November 23, 2021 8:35 pm

        Definitely not. I can carry my digital studio everywhere

        Reply
    • Chris J Coyne

      on November 22, 2021 5:42 pm

      Not any more. Hybrid at best, I’m afraid. I come from the large console / tape era (and even had a Portastudio). In the box for most things now, with just a bit of classic outboard on vocals or when tracking needs to breathe, or have some air. Tape maintenance was a pain (as were some consoles) and near zero latency tracking plus unlimited mixing paths these days mean if you can get 90% of the analog sound, especially in a dense mix, then that’s good enough for me!

      Reply
      • Maldo

        on November 22, 2021 11:20 pm

        I think hybrid sets are the best nowadays! Cheers

        Reply
        • Jiri aka Rivermint

          on November 26, 2021 12:12 am

          Yes, I would like really. Its because we lost so much using entirelly digital only for the sake of easy production. Take The Beatles for instance, that sound is pure magic.

          Reply
      • RD

        on September 15, 2022 11:34 am

        I had a 3340 as my first tape machine and then Pete Townsend got involved in the band I was working with and leant me his Tascam 8 track on a number of occasions. When we started doing quite well as a band, we upgraded to a 16 track one inch Tascam and as the technology allowed ran a SMPTE from it to outboard drums machines, synths, sequencers etc. What I remember about that time was how to compete with the 2 inch Studers etc.in the big studios, as the smaller format tape machines never ever replayed a dynamic beat (such as an 808 bass drum) accurately. It just could not handle the punch. So we were itching for digital formats and never ever thought of the distortion factors of analogue, warmth etc because to get the punch and no tape hiss was the holy grail. How times change.

        Reply
        • Tomislav Zlatic

          on September 15, 2022 12:33 pm

          Welcome to BPB! And haha, I know what you mean. The grass is always greener on the other side!

          Reply
    • West McGowan

      on November 22, 2021 5:54 pm

      Would love to, just don’t have the money!

      Reply
    • Marco B.

      on November 22, 2021 7:36 pm

      Today is my lucky day, this is why Im going to win :-)

      Reply
    • Flammodo

      on November 22, 2021 9:17 pm

      No, I would not

      Reply
    • Christopher Watson

      on November 22, 2021 10:23 pm

      Yes I do.

      Reply
    • xero kar

      on November 23, 2021 4:57 am

      No ! i don’t know how to use

      Reply
    • Fazil Irak

      on November 23, 2021 8:53 am

      No I would not

      Reply
    • daniel martinez gil

      on November 23, 2021 1:35 pm

      en verdad creo que por siempre no lo cambiaria

      Reply
    • Maurice Doucette

      on November 23, 2021 2:00 pm

      No, not worth the trouble.

      Reply
    • John Irvine

      on November 23, 2021 3:31 pm

      No

      Reply
    • Peter Teipe

      on November 23, 2021 5:56 pm

      I did a lot on my cassette four track years ago, but at this point I probably wouldn’t trade my digital studio for analog

      Reply
    • Med

      on November 23, 2021 6:13 pm

      No way. Workflow is so precious. All-analog would slow me down so much.

      Reply
    • Vikramjit Banerjee

      on November 23, 2021 6:48 pm

      No i would not ever substitute my digital studio for an entirely analog one

      Vik

      Reply
    • Ciro Santana

      on November 24, 2021 2:15 am

      Yes, I think I could.

      Reply
    • Martin

      on November 24, 2021 11:53 am

      I guess i‘d always like to use a hybrid setup.

      Reply
    • Martin

      on November 24, 2021 11:54 am

      I guess i‘d always like to use a hybrid setup. So no, id not

      Reply
    • Richard Taylor

      on November 24, 2021 2:24 pm

      I would! infant in 1991 I was already! with my trusty Tascam TSR8 half inch machine! now I’m using a MacBook and protools but still use my half inch TASCAM recorder to run my mixes thru as it generates a nice vibe. And clients think it looks cool too! ;-)

      Reply
    • T R A E Z A R

      on November 24, 2021 10:03 pm

      yeah i would ..id get shadow hills compressor an LA2A , DISTRESSOR…AN ANALOGUE SOUND IS SO UNIQUE. id also get a few Neuman 87s ,a large ssl mixing board with yamaha hs8 studio monitors …

      Reply
    • Victor

      on November 24, 2021 11:11 pm

      I would if I had the money!

      Reply
    • Alby Arranz

      on November 27, 2021 9:09 am

      My Answer is NO!

      Reply
    • Gavish Patel

      on November 28, 2021 10:00 pm

      No I wont do that. I like to use both for production. I have a Yamaha Multi Track and love the Tape Sounds.

      Reply
    • RAMON ARAUJO

      on November 30, 2021 9:28 pm

      Não, eu não trocaria, mas gostaria de ter mais equipamentos analógicos. Trabalhar com um híbrido de digital e analógicos

      Reply
  2. Daryl Wright

    on November 22, 2021 3:16 pm

    No way!

    Reply
    • Gustavo Garrido

      on November 22, 2021 5:56 pm

      Absolutely not! Today in Digital you can do incredible things and hardware will be less and less necessary. It is not the bow or the arrow, the important thing is who shoots.

      Reply
    • Ahmet

      on November 23, 2021 8:54 am

      No I would not

      Reply
    • Enrique

      on November 26, 2021 1:59 pm

      I wouldn’t. Too much time world be spent resetting and.normalizing things between projects, and I could probably only work with one client at a time. That’s a hard no for me.

      Reply
  3. Tansu

    on November 22, 2021 3:18 pm

    I would love to have a fully analog studio, from the 80′ and 90′ era.

    Reply
  4. Rem

    on November 22, 2021 3:24 pm

    Yes. Only for analog recording sessions.

    Reply
    • Aaron Jacobi

      on November 22, 2021 5:21 pm

      I like the best of both worlds, I like digital and analogue, I utilise a 4 track cassette recorder and so.e rack mount stuff in my set up, I would never switch to full analogue though as modern day technology presents unlimited possibilities, combined with the limitations of analogue a hybrid digital analogue set up is the best way to go.

      Reply
      • Guy

        on November 22, 2021 6:55 pm

        No, it’s a long time since I had to edit with a block and a razor blade.

        Reply
  5. stan goodspeed

    on November 22, 2021 3:25 pm

    If i only were mixing big band and jazz i might, but in order to be able to do any genre i would probably not

    Reply
  6. Michael Tra

    on November 22, 2021 3:38 pm

    Yes I would, I feel like I would be more creative

    Reply
    • Lotuz

      on November 22, 2021 5:18 pm

      No, I want the best of both worlds.

      Reply
      • Jay Northall

        on November 22, 2021 5:56 pm

        I would like to say yes but I like both analogue and digital equally as they both have pros and cons…so no for now.

        Reply
    • Tiago

      on November 22, 2021 5:27 pm

      Honestly i am split in etween. Analog gear has an clear in the sound department but i think the digital realm is way too convienient.

      Good review!

      Reply
  7. Tone

    on November 22, 2021 3:39 pm

    I wouldn’t, there are too many advantages in digital audio.

    Reply
  8. Andy

    on November 22, 2021 3:51 pm

    already yes, thanks bpb

    Reply
  9. Kamil

    on November 22, 2021 3:54 pm

    HIBRID

    Reply
  10. HSN

    on November 22, 2021 3:55 pm

    I am fully digital and do not look back. I still remember dealing with cables distorting signal. If I want analog feel, especially tape machine there are plugins for it without need to waste time with setting tape machine head and EQ.

    Reply
  11. Wolfy

    on November 22, 2021 3:59 pm

    Yes, anytime!

    Reply
  12. Priyanshu Kainthola

    on November 22, 2021 4:00 pm

    Maybe, who Knows
    if I like the Analog Sound and will have money to purchase it.

    Reply
  13. Corti.Son

    on November 22, 2021 4:01 pm

    Hi, I’d love to have a completely analog studio and the bucks to keep it running, but I’d probably miss a lot of things too.

    Reply
  14. J

    on November 22, 2021 4:05 pm

    Never, unless that full analog studio comes with two assistants doing all the tedious work for me.

    Reply
  15. Alexain

    on November 22, 2021 4:13 pm

    No, never. I think it’s way better digital now.

    Reply
  16. Max Gavrilov

    on November 22, 2021 4:14 pm

    No, digital world is here. And of course it’s much easier to work with digital resources!

    Reply
  17. Jack G

    on November 22, 2021 4:24 pm

    I would say yes. I would have to find all my virtual gear in reality but I think there’s definitely a charm to it and a certain benefit of not having constant distraction or visualization. Though for some tasks I would miss the digital world (but not that much). So yes would be my answer :)

    Reply
  18. SimonP

    on November 22, 2021 4:26 pm

    I think in our times it is not possible, if there was the possibility I would like to try it the full 100% analog :)

    Reply
  19. Chris

    on November 22, 2021 4:26 pm

    That’s a tough question to answer. If you’d asked that question 15 years ago, I without a doubt would say, “Give me the analog studio.” Today, it’s not that easy. Plugin emulations and as well as creative digital plugins have come a long way. So the question for me is, dealing with analog limitations and mix recall, is it worth having an all analog studio? I’d have to say it’s not worth the headache that comes with an all analog studio. It’s more than just the limitations and mix recall to consider. You have to maintain all of the analog gear. Everyone knows gear breaks down and always needs repair of some type. And it always happens at the worst time. So, to wrap up my answer, I’ll stick with digital.
    p.s. Hybrid setup is idea.

    Reply
    • Chris

      on November 22, 2021 4:28 pm

      Sorry for the grammar mistakes. I was in a hurry.

      Reply
      • Nicolas Hourquet

        on November 22, 2021 8:41 pm

        Whaou, hardware mais pourquoi, ik est dans ma boite a outils et j espere bientôt que teac aussi. Fan fan fan.

        Reply
        • George ware

          on November 24, 2021 11:30 pm

          Yes, I don’t have any of the vintage gear so this would be a good start

          George ware

          Reply
  20. Axel Ferrari

    on November 22, 2021 4:28 pm

    NOT TODAY! In the box I can work on multiple project at the same time. Analog gear is not ok for today production rythm (and maybe this is the reason why we have a lot of bad music! :S)

    Reply
  21. marti garaughty

    on November 22, 2021 4:30 pm

    With extensive experience in both analog & digital recording, NO I could never go back. It would be like giving up my car for a horse & buggy ! ;-)

    Reply
    • Roman

      on November 22, 2021 4:35 pm

      Exactly, lol.

      Reply
  22. Tim

    on November 22, 2021 4:32 pm

    No, the complement each other!

    Reply
  23. Roman

    on November 22, 2021 4:34 pm

    «Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?»
    No way! All in the box, baby!

    Reply
  24. Gery Zenz

    on November 22, 2021 4:37 pm

    beautiful emulation!

    Reply
  25. Tim

    on November 22, 2021 4:38 pm

    Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?

    Yes, I would! If I got some analog vintage EQ’s/Compressor’s/Limiter’s, I could just rebuy the digital Stuff I really need. ;)

    Reply
  26. Patrick

    on November 22, 2021 4:49 pm

    Not a chance!

    The great thing about tools like these is being able to get very close to the sonic benefits of working with analog gear without the hassle of working with analog hardware.

    Reply
  27. Sergey

    on November 22, 2021 5:09 pm

    Nope, nope, nope %)

    Reply
  28. A3C

    on November 22, 2021 5:10 pm

    NO WAY. I wish I could see everyone here who said “yes” trying to copy Chorus 1 on Chorus 2 using a 24 tracks ATR.

    Reply
    • Tristan G.

      on November 22, 2021 11:02 pm

      I probably won’t because of the place needed for analog pieces.

      Reply
  29. André Langenfeld

    on November 22, 2021 5:10 pm

    if the required space comes with it, of course!

    Reply
  30. Pablin Drummer

    on November 22, 2021 5:11 pm

    Yes…..and No!

    Reply
  31. Najib Husein

    on November 22, 2021 5:11 pm

    No

    Reply
  32. Keegan

    on November 22, 2021 5:11 pm

    If I had all the money I needed? I would take an all-analog setup in a heartbeat, sheeeeeeeeeeesh

    Reply
    • Bart

      on November 22, 2021 5:16 pm

      Not, i love digital studio with analog simulations. :)

      Reply
  33. Joao Bispo

    on November 22, 2021 5:11 pm

    I wouldn’t replace my digital studio for an analog one, for convenience, the planet and flexibility on the move.

    Reply
  34. Stefan

    on November 22, 2021 5:11 pm

    I am more flexible with my digital gear and therfore my answer is no!

    Reply
  35. Stevie Mac

    on November 22, 2021 5:12 pm

    No chance, there is a place for analog gear and I have a few pieces, but the convenience and versatility of digital gear and software far outstrips the any benefit being ‘all analog’ would bring, especially for mere bedroom producers like ourselves!

    Reply
  36. emmanuel hubaut

    on November 22, 2021 5:12 pm

    No, Mix of Analog and digital is the best !

    Reply
  37. Enzo

    on November 22, 2021 5:12 pm

    Non avendo un hardware analogico, non posso fare la differenza,

    Reply
  38. Petr Piskunov

    on November 22, 2021 5:13 pm

    I have no time for analog mix. No.

    Reply
  39. malik amer

    on November 22, 2021 5:13 pm

    yeah for sure if I got a great analog one but that will never happen hahahaha

    Reply
  40. Sean Mulhern

    on November 22, 2021 5:13 pm

    If I had the space I would.

    Reply
  41. Matt St-L

    on November 22, 2021 5:14 pm

    I would not, sadly because we’re in a time where digital is as good as what analog was king back in the days. Save so much space that we can emulate a huge studio right from our home!

    Reply
  42. Rustam

    on November 22, 2021 5:14 pm

    Perhaps, but first I would try.

    Reply
  43. Laura

    on November 22, 2021 5:14 pm

    Why go back to fully analog when there is the Tascam Tape Collection to get that analog sound? Working in a DAW is so much faster and convenient.

    Reply
  44. Ralf

    on November 22, 2021 5:14 pm

    No, nerver. Niemals nicht, nein!

    Reply
  45. Greyvin

    on November 22, 2021 5:15 pm

    No, I definitely wouldn’t

    Reply
  46. Alex

    on November 22, 2021 5:15 pm

    Mostly not. Maybe some units

    Reply
  47. Nico de Haan

    on November 22, 2021 5:16 pm

    I prefer a combi

    Reply
  48. Leonid Velichkovski

    on November 22, 2021 5:16 pm

    No!

    Reply
  49. Brodie Conley

    on November 22, 2021 5:16 pm

    You’d have to be nuts to do that! No way would I substitute that.

    Reply
  50. Jed

    on November 22, 2021 5:16 pm

    I think you picked the wrong question to ask. Most of us have studied and get used to DIGITAL environment lol….Whatever you make on an analog, live or even psychoacoustic device, it will end up DIGITAL : 44100 – 96000hz 16/24/32 bit…..come to terms with it already.

    Reply
  51. Jorjhan Castro

    on November 22, 2021 5:17 pm

    Not really, I would use them both, taking advantage of the two worlds

    Reply
  52. Henrique Carvalhal

    on November 22, 2021 5:17 pm

    Not entirely, I would always prefer having an hybrid between digital and analog.

    Reply
  53. Alex Swanson

    on November 22, 2021 5:17 pm

    Yes. because its the natural course of progress of the music industry!

    Reply
  54. L Baldwin

    on November 22, 2021 5:18 pm

    I would not go full analog! I like working hybrid and digital offers so much more speed and efficiency that
    is very hard to match when rewinding and loading tape. I’ve worked in both and I’m pretty happy on the computer at the moment.

    Reply
  55. Wilson Sierra

    on November 22, 2021 5:19 pm

    If I would have a complete human equipment that bring me his help working with the analog devices, I would change digital for analog, i would have TASCAM Tape collection!!!

    Reply
  56. djsegwon kithebeats

    on November 22, 2021 5:19 pm

    If I had the space, YES!

    Reply
  57. Norman Lariviere

    on November 22, 2021 5:23 pm

    No, a hybrid setup with an automated analog console and amazing converters is what I would prefer.

    Reply
  58. Mark P

    on November 22, 2021 5:25 pm

    Yes, I would! Only to get the feel of Analog Hardware. I have never used those and have only heard of it.

    Reply
  59. ZAIZAR ESTUDIOS

    on November 22, 2021 5:25 pm

    Si lo haría, aunque hay demasiadas ventajas en el audio digital, por eso estas hermosas emulaciones de sonidos análogos que llegan a nuestro estudio

    Reply
  60. Andrew

    on November 22, 2021 5:25 pm

    Never!

    Reply
  61. Michal

    on November 22, 2021 5:26 pm

    Definitely not. I am fan of some analog equipment but complete analog world take too much time and money. I think some emulations are very good and can give you great results too.

    Reply
  62. hai

    on November 22, 2021 5:26 pm

    no, I’m too much of a zoomer

    Reply
  63. Dominik

    on November 22, 2021 5:26 pm

    No, i want!

    Reply
  64. Jim Baker

    on November 22, 2021 5:26 pm

    No too many benefits with digital

    Reply
  65. imstre jonas

    on November 22, 2021 5:26 pm

    No. I think it’s way better digital now.

    Reply
  66. Jessica

    on November 22, 2021 5:26 pm

    I would prefer the Digital variant over the analog one. Digital version is more convenient for me.

    Reply
  67. Alain

    on November 22, 2021 5:27 pm

    I would never go back to fully analog, the DAW let’s you work from anywhere, besides equipment can get super expensive and it won’t last forever, but I would love to have some analog equipment for my studio and do a hybrid settup, plugins still can’t 100% emulate the analog ¨textures¨ and ¨warmness¨.

    Reply
  68. Mickaël Duvallet

    on November 22, 2021 5:27 pm

    No. Unless i become the boss of a real studio..

    Reply
  69. Ruben Granado

    on November 22, 2021 5:27 pm

    Si, espero que algun día pueda hacero.

    Reply
  70. Carlos

    on November 22, 2021 5:28 pm

    If I had the money yes… I love analog stuff… but to be honest, software designers are doing spectacular jobs! It make us re-think if analog its fully necessary when you have not too much money.

    Reply
  71. lesego sehume

    on November 22, 2021 5:28 pm

    In the digital age with available emulations like Tascam Tape Collection I will not move to analogue gear.

    Reply
  72. Project

    on November 22, 2021 5:28 pm

    No, for practical reasons I can only consider a hybrid or digital only setup

    Reply
  73. Jim Baker

    on November 22, 2021 5:28 pm

    No too many benefits with digital, hybrid the way to go for me

    Reply
  74. Nick

    on November 22, 2021 5:28 pm

    No. Can’t beat the convenience of digital.

    Reply
  75. Santiago Barceló

    on November 22, 2021 5:29 pm

    Hi !. No, I wouldn’t use only analog devices, but they are great ! Thanks for this article.

    Reply
  76. Rich Cooke

    on November 22, 2021 5:29 pm

    no I would not. People use what technology is available at the time, the notion that analog is better is ridiculous. The pioneers of analog would possibly be using digital if it were available.

    Reply
  77. ambedo

    on November 22, 2021 5:29 pm

    If i worked more in the traditional band sector (rock, country, jazz, vocal recording ext) i would absolutely take a fully analog studio. But for the genres im into – digital/hybrid setup is the only way to go.

    Reply
  78. Sheldon Young

    on November 22, 2021 5:29 pm

    Yes, if that’s all I had

    Reply
  79. Ivan Grigorov

    on November 22, 2021 5:30 pm

    I would love to have a fully analog studio, but i’ll use both.

    Reply
  80. Andrey Surin

    on November 22, 2021 5:30 pm

    Never! But it could be for a short time, for analog recording sessions. But then again, I would go back to digital audio and plugins.

    Reply
  81. Sultan

    on November 22, 2021 5:31 pm

    Nope

    Reply
  82. Johannes

    on November 22, 2021 5:31 pm

    No, never ever. I had to record on tape and editing tape is a slow, never-ending pain of jog&shuttle.

    Reply
  83. CKJ

    on November 22, 2021 5:32 pm

    nono

    Reply
  84. Lars Morten Lindberg

    on November 22, 2021 5:33 pm

    Nope!

    Reply
  85. Cédric

    on November 22, 2021 5:33 pm

    I would

    Reply
  86. Tony

    on November 22, 2021 5:33 pm

    Both have their place, but you can’t swap all the way!

    Reply
  87. Satyabrata Choudhury

    on November 22, 2021 5:34 pm

    No, no way.

    Reply
  88. HITESH BANDHU

    on November 22, 2021 5:35 pm

    for me i can’t sacrifice one for the other. I need both

    Reply
  89. Khael Thai

    on November 22, 2021 5:36 pm

    Esto es genial sin duda, gracias por todo BPB.

    Reply
  90. Spit

    on November 22, 2021 5:37 pm

    Oui pourquoi pas si mes moyens me le permettent, mais j’aime les deux mondes !

    Reply
  91. Jordi

    on November 22, 2021 5:38 pm

    hell no
    But i would go hybrid for sure

    Reply
  92. Frank Ndlovu

    on November 22, 2021 5:39 pm

    Never in a million years I like having the best of both worlds

    Reply
  93. Lipton Pattnayak

    on November 22, 2021 5:39 pm

    Surely would love to, If I can get a boatload of money from somewhere.

    Reply
  94. Alper

    on November 22, 2021 5:39 pm

    No, i want

    Reply
  95. David Borg

    on November 22, 2021 5:40 pm

    I would only convert to an all analog setup if I got to work with Jack White at one of his studios lol. Or else it’s not worth it

    Reply
  96. Baptiste Brasseur

    on November 22, 2021 5:41 pm

    Of course, just for the fact of not being enslaved by a computer…

    Reply
  97. javier cruz

    on November 22, 2021 5:41 pm

    Not a fully analog studio, but a hybrid digital analog studio is the best option today.

    Reply
  98. Pedro Valério

    on November 22, 2021 5:41 pm

    I would think about it but I would like to have both

    Reply
  99. Ryan H

    on November 22, 2021 5:41 pm

    Nope, would not replace digital workstation though I’m a fan of tape

    Reply
  100. Willem Moller

    on November 22, 2021 5:43 pm

    No I wouldn’t, but I do use a lot of analog gear – console, preamps, compressors – when tracking.

    Reply
  101. Mark C

    on November 22, 2021 5:44 pm

    No-I don’t have the space!

    Reply
  102. James Reynolds

    on November 22, 2021 5:44 pm

    Yes but safe in the knowledge I’d ultimately be able to have both.

    Reply
  103. Patrik Roncolato

    on November 22, 2021 5:45 pm

    not at all ;)

    Reply
  104. Diogo Soares

    on November 22, 2021 5:46 pm

    No, entirely no, but a part of it, yeah!

    Reply
  105. Larry Larraga

    on November 22, 2021 5:47 pm

    I would NEVER substitute my digital studio for an entirely analog one!

    Reply
  106. Gotno

    on November 22, 2021 5:47 pm

    Sure why not right? It’d be fun to flail around in a completely different way than usual! :)

    Reply
  107. Rikk Show

    on November 22, 2021 5:49 pm

    No. Digital in the box has so many advantages. But from a workflow perspective who doesn’t love knobs and tweaking? That is pure inspiration and very useful to keep it fun and be creative. Hard to beat my original ms-20 when it comes to that. Nice to see you get so much engagement nowadays by the way.

    Reply
  108. Nicholas

    on November 22, 2021 5:50 pm

    Yup, in a heartbeat…. grew up analog, love the sound, nothing like it.

    Reply
  109. Luke Franks

    on November 22, 2021 5:52 pm

    No. Definitely not.

    Reply
  110. Eugeniu Costin

    on November 22, 2021 5:52 pm

    With all due respect to analog hardware, I would never change. Then now with such precise emulation and with all the ease of routing on a pc it is much easier, even to open a project from two years ago. I would opt for digital.

    Reply
  111. Richard Surratt

    on November 22, 2021 5:52 pm

    NEVAH

    Reply
  112. Pablo

    on November 22, 2021 5:53 pm

    Yes. More tactile. A different feel.

    Reply
  113. Kyle

    on November 22, 2021 5:54 pm

    No. I had a fully analog studio once upon a time. While I miss some of the simplicity, the digital domain has provided so much more flexibility. I had a Tascam Portastudio similar to the one this plugin emulates. It would be cool to use that and hear if it sounds familiar.

    Reply
  114. DHM

    on November 22, 2021 5:56 pm

    No.

    Reply
  115. Angelo Colasanti

    on November 22, 2021 5:56 pm

    I’d rather build a logical mix between the digital and analog studios. With an totally analog set there a level of attention when recording, to avoid editing, such feeling doesn’t exist on the digital world, you can record an entire song by gluying small phrases/loops.. I don’t know. Cheers!

    Reply
  116. Dimitar Yosifov

    on November 22, 2021 5:59 pm

    no,i don,t

    Reply
  117. Marcio Fernandes

    on November 22, 2021 6:00 pm

    No way! Digital all the way! 🤩

    Reply
  118. Fabricio Viscardi

    on November 22, 2021 6:01 pm

    Nope. That would be crazy.

    Reply
  119. Tefes

    on November 22, 2021 6:01 pm

    As sick as I am of computer hardware repeatedly failing on me, no I wouldn’t. A digital studio is just too flexible.

    Reply
  120. Sebastian

    on November 22, 2021 6:01 pm

    no, prefiero hibrido

    Reply
  121. Haroun

    on November 22, 2021 6:02 pm

    I Totally Would, then after the said substitution, I would re-digitalize it progressively by Only Adding what I need in a given situation

    Reply
  122. Fabricio Viscardi

    on November 22, 2021 6:02 pm

    Nope. That would be crazy. Totally crazy.

    Reply
  123. Daniel S

    on November 22, 2021 6:03 pm

    No I wouldn’t swap my digital studio for an all analogue one, I don’t have the space or the money and would also miss the easy editing that digital allows.

    Reply
  124. Michael Filser

    on November 22, 2021 6:03 pm

    Only if I had the space and of course the money:-)

    Reply
  125. Ray Andrade

    on November 22, 2021 6:04 pm

    No. I would not.

    Reply
  126. Silas Garrett

    on November 22, 2021 6:05 pm

    If I somehow got an analog studio for free, I would totally try to use it on its own, but it’s not something I would seek out.

    Reply
  127. ALBiON

    on November 22, 2021 6:06 pm

    No. Digital has too much going for it on so many levels.

    Reply
  128. Pablo Baico

    on November 22, 2021 6:08 pm

    Really… mix of analog and digital is the best option for me.
    Thanks and good luck for everybody.

    Reply
  129. Vassils Pantazopoulos

    on November 22, 2021 6:08 pm

    No,i would not.

    Reply
  130. LUCIANO

    on November 22, 2021 6:08 pm

    Não trocaria, mas um Modelo Híbrido seria bastante interessante

    Reply
  131. Michael Svedberg

    on November 22, 2021 6:08 pm

    I think I more or less already have a digital studio, but I would sure love to swap out a couple of items for analogue gear instead. Nothing beats the memories of using the old Tascam 244 deck when recording ;)

    Reply
  132. Vitaly Smotrov

    on November 22, 2021 6:09 pm

    yes!

    Reply
  133. Amey Jichkar

    on November 22, 2021 6:09 pm

    I Definitely wouldn’t switch to complete analog. Unless we are living in a post apocalyptic scenario where there are no computers or the internet.

    Reply
  134. Francois M

    on November 22, 2021 6:09 pm

    No , thanks, maybe in another life

    Reply
  135. Amey Jichkar

    on November 22, 2021 6:10 pm

    I wouldn’t switch to a completely analog system, unless we are living in a post apocalyptic scenario where there are no computers or the internet.

    Reply
  136. Brian

    on November 22, 2021 6:10 pm

    No I like to blend both analog & digital, finding the best of both worlds.

    Reply
  137. Alexey

    on November 22, 2021 6:11 pm

    Entirely? No.

    Reply
  138. manni

    on November 22, 2021 6:11 pm

    Recallabilty-argument is too strong
    greetings 2 all

    Reply
  139. Mark

    on November 22, 2021 6:12 pm

    No. Staying digital!

    Reply
  140. Mike

    on November 22, 2021 6:13 pm

    No, I have my process, which is 90% in the box.

    Reply
  141. Stanislav

    on November 22, 2021 6:13 pm

    I have never done this, but I would love to have such an experience.

    Reply
  142. Vitor Melo

    on November 22, 2021 6:14 pm

    Not just because it doesn’t have an appropriate structure for it

    Reply
  143. Serg

    on November 22, 2021 6:14 pm

    I would if I can build it collecting freebies here.

    Reply
  144. Uriel Soto, Jr.

    on November 22, 2021 6:14 pm

    I WOULD NOT COMPLETELY SWITCH FROM DIGITAL TO ANALOG. A HYBRID OR COMBINATION OF BOTH IS GOOD BUT NOT COMPLETELY ANALOG.

    Reply
  145. Yi-Wen

    on November 22, 2021 6:14 pm

    Probably not… depending on what caliber of analog gear we’re talking about!

    Reply
  146. Allen Somerlot

    on November 22, 2021 6:15 pm

    I don’t believe it would be nearly as practical to REPLACE my digital capabilities. I WOULD welcome the addition of analog goodness in any case ;)

    Reply
  147. Lex

    on November 22, 2021 6:16 pm

    Yo creo que es mejor tener a ambos mundos conviviendo.

    Así tenemos ambas ventajas sobre todo por la historia y lo bien que suenan.

    Reply
  148. Vassilis Pantazopoulos

    on November 22, 2021 6:17 pm

    No,i would not

    Reply
  149. Matt Hooper

    on November 22, 2021 6:17 pm

    Yes, but the id sell it and go digital again.

    Reply
  150. Ragnar

    on November 22, 2021 6:17 pm

    No. Don’t want to miss Melodyne for example.

    Reply
  151. Angelo Furlan

    on November 22, 2021 6:17 pm

    I’d go all analog if if I had the room AND if I could also lose about 20 years off my age. If I have to go back in time, let me go all the way.

    Reply
  152. Javi Robles

    on November 22, 2021 6:17 pm

    Maybe, if I have enough money and space to have an analog studio xD.

    Reply
  153. Julius

    on November 22, 2021 6:20 pm

    No.

    Reply
  154. William Lopes

    on November 22, 2021 6:21 pm

    I would say no because the music industry has evolved a lot, especially when it comes to the digital age.

    Reply
  155. Deighton Warner

    on November 22, 2021 6:24 pm

    No. I would not! I actually still own the A-3340S and had the A-3440 and back in time, the options then between tape, using bias and speed were tremendous factors in quality. I had many a recording using the same Sony stereo mic come out completely different with some very WARM better than cassette and some with unbelievable Hiss! I just use it for running my master bus through sometimes but not always because the plugins are so predictable now.

    I think the video review is excellent because I remember some decisions I made were budget related to tape costs.

    Reply
  156. Aris

    on November 22, 2021 6:24 pm

    No

    Reply
  157. Ivan

    on November 22, 2021 6:24 pm

    I would like to combine both options. I think it would be more rational.

    Reply
  158. Mika

    on November 22, 2021 6:25 pm

    Yes…..of course.

    Reply
  159. Alexandr Vasiltsov

    on November 22, 2021 6:26 pm

    Today I don’t want to deal with analog equipment. I manage with digital emulation of these devices and everything suits me perfectly.

    Reply
  160. Rainer Spechtl

    on November 22, 2021 6:26 pm

    No, never!

    Reply
  161. nick vlassis

    on November 22, 2021 6:27 pm

    ABSOLUTELY WOULD !! The sound I can get out of analog is a nice change from our advanced digital world of music we live in now !

    Reply
  162. Ryan

    on November 22, 2021 6:27 pm

    No, I wouldn’t want a purely analog studio. I prefer to use a DAW and plugins for most things along with some hardware (digital and analog) that I can’t replicate in a DAW or that I enjoy using more than plugin equivalents.

    Reply
  163. alp

    on November 22, 2021 6:28 pm

    I can’t say anything positive but I think a hybrid studio would be nice as I have used some analog equipment in the past.

    Reply
  164. Gabriel

    on November 22, 2021 6:29 pm

    I choose to stay Hybrid, picking the best of both worlds!

    Reply
  165. o t

    on November 22, 2021 6:29 pm

    Not sure

    Reply
  166. Eldad

    on November 22, 2021 6:30 pm

    Yes I would :)

    Reply
  167. Jose Mari Ibanez

    on November 22, 2021 6:30 pm

    I actually wouldn’t *fully* go analog. I’d rather go hybrid, but mostly digital. While having some hardware is nice, it wouldn’t really be helpful for electronic genres. Most hardware nowadays simply cannot achieve what digital plugins can do. But still, when recording, it would be nice to get that analog warmth and magic.

    Reply
  168. Mike

    on November 22, 2021 6:31 pm

    No, hybrid is the way !

    Reply
  169. Thomas

    on November 22, 2021 6:32 pm

    I will not dare to completely switch to analogue. However, I really like to use analog devices in combination with digital capabilities.

    Reply
  170. Psolkaiyn

    on November 22, 2021 6:33 pm

    Mm, for the question. Even if they did it for free and managed to reproduce every strange and wholly digital effect and synth in my collection in analog form and it was guaranteed that I would legitimately have the space for all of that gear… the answer is still a resounding NO. The convenience of having all of these synths and effects easily accessible in one small but powerful and versatile box is simply too great to give up. That being said, I do see the value in having a few choice pieces of analog gear around that I would use regularly.

    Reply
  171. gabriel garcia

    on November 22, 2021 6:35 pm

    Hoy dia segun mi punto de vista prefiero lo digital,por su versatilidad.Gracias

    Reply
  172. Evgeniy

    on November 22, 2021 6:36 pm

    No!

    Reply
  173. Uchindami

    on November 22, 2021 6:36 pm

    I definitely would do that if money grew on trees

    Reply
    • Uchindami

      on November 22, 2021 6:38 pm

      However, I would look for analog hardware which produce less noise than the vintage ones

      Reply
  174. Juan21pedraza

    on November 22, 2021 6:36 pm

    Of course not because both have pros and cons and It is better to work with both.

    Reply
  175. Michael N

    on November 22, 2021 6:36 pm

    No, pure analog would be far too restrictive and cumbersome for me.

    Reply
  176. Hector Baldiviezo

    on November 22, 2021 6:37 pm

    Depende las circunstancias.

    Reply
  177. Jimmy De Keersmaeker

    on November 22, 2021 6:37 pm

    No, but it would be nice to have some analog gear next to the computer. It really could be a source of inspiration and give some magic touch.

    Reply
  178. Rodson Martins

    on November 22, 2021 6:39 pm

    Não, eu não trocaria meu estúdio digital por um estúdio totalmente analógico, mas consideraria fazer uso hibrido: digital e analógico.

    Reply
  179. Célio Marin

    on November 22, 2021 6:40 pm

    Com certeza sim, caso houvesse essa possibilidade!

    Reply
  180. Thomas Brunhøj

    on November 22, 2021 6:41 pm

    No i would not. I want the benefit of hybrid setup.

    Reply
  181. Jomani Moore

    on November 22, 2021 6:41 pm

    No – Too time consuming – Digital comes close enough that the time that is saved makes it worth it

    Reply
  182. PureFire

    on November 22, 2021 6:42 pm

    Thank you for the opportunity James, BPB & IK Multimedia & Happy 50th Anniversary to TASCAM.
    A great review James, thats a really interesting read & very helpful as well, thank you.
    A tape machine must be one of the hardest things to covert into an audio plug-in with all things considered. at least theres no need to buy any tape for it tho haha.
    Q: Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?
    A: yes, i have never had fully analog studio & if i didn’t like it, i’d swap back lol
    thanks again 😊❤️

    Reply
  183. Javier Alzate

    on November 22, 2021 6:42 pm

    Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?

    digital equipment for me is fine. I like them. but I really like being in the middle of the two universes of musical production

    Reply
  184. Carl

    on November 22, 2021 6:43 pm

    Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?

    No.

    Reply
  185. Jet

    on November 22, 2021 6:44 pm

    No, digital is easy to manage.

    Reply
  186. Lesha

    on November 22, 2021 6:46 pm

    No, I would not.

    Reply
  187. manni

    on November 22, 2021 6:47 pm

    mh, this question must be a trap xD

    Reply
  188. Carlos Flores

    on November 22, 2021 6:49 pm

    just some of them. May be for nostalgy.

    Reply
  189. jay

    on November 22, 2021 6:50 pm

    No way!

    Reply
  190. Max

    on November 22, 2021 6:52 pm

    Скорее всего нет. Но рассмотрел бы как дополнение!

    Reply
  191. Adrian Gottstein

    on November 22, 2021 6:54 pm

    Well I really dig an analog workflow, but since I like recording and editing digitally I would always go the hybrid way. So to answer in short : Nope I wouldn’t.

    Reply
  192. Bryan Peppin

    on November 22, 2021 6:54 pm

    No.. I’m In The Box.. and don’t see that happening!!

    Reply
  193. Anton Popov

    on November 22, 2021 6:56 pm

    No, I don’t

    Reply
  194. Attaman

    on November 22, 2021 6:56 pm

    With all the tecnology of today and industries like T-racks that invest on it, we don’t need those analog gear so much as it was on the past, so i would keep my digital studio!!!

    Reply
  195. Glauco W. Beall

    on November 22, 2021 6:57 pm

    There’s no analog equipment for free,so…

    Reply
  196. Oliver

    on November 22, 2021 6:57 pm

    No way! Wait, do I get to sell some of that analog gear, and get me some more digital? 😄

    Reply
  197. Ioannis Mermigkas

    on November 22, 2021 6:57 pm

    With today’s technology I would not.

    Reply
  198. Peter Bojesen

    on November 22, 2021 6:58 pm

    No. Digital is limitless

    Reply
  199. Dino Cikaric

    on November 22, 2021 6:58 pm

    I would because digital software does not have any value after you buy it, though it is much easier to carry around with you 😂 Analog does take more work when things need fixing but the sound difference is unmatchable compared to most plugins. We are seeing some vst’s come close to originals but there still needs to be work done.

    In my opinion Analog is a hands on experience that cannot be replicated by digital.

    Reply
  200. Olaf

    on November 22, 2021 7:03 pm

    Tricky question. I’ve thought about that myself.

    Being an analog recording studio engineer was an adventure – both for good and for bad. Finishing a record was an accomplishment in itself, not in how it did on the market, and it involved hands on, perpetual creative problem solving, ingenuity, technical knowledge, not just musical, and a lot of energy. I feel that sense of adventure is lost now. You had to be a lot more decisive – again, for better and for worst – and know what you’re doing a lot more, because there was no going back on anything – or it wasn’t easy. DAWs have brought a very interesting paradox – you mix first and record later – you can mix your demo takes and record the “flawless” takes – let’s call them that – after, as long as you keep the source signal chain unchanged – minimalistic, at that – gain on your interface, the same instrument, etc.

    That’s why the whole profession was a lot more prestigious. Add to that the music was a lot better, and mixing, in itself, was a lot more artistic than it is today, for all the talk about “character”, “tone”, bla-bla, most people today apply technical processing, and not artistic processing, which makes mixing a lost art – or maybe there’s just so many dilettantes in it, with all the accessibility, which makes it seem that way.

    The answer to the question, to me, comes down to sound. I’ve recently realized from all the thousands of records that I’ve listened to, 95% of which being from the era of analog, or recorded like that, I can name maybe a handful that are technically flawless (weird thing is it’s still a minority of technically flawless records today, when there’s no technical or resource related reason for it). Most of them suffered from mud, problematic EQ-ing, things getting lost, oversaturation, so on, so forth. But they’re ALL sonically beautiful. Amazingly enough. All of them. That’s what it’s about. Sonic beauty – the beauty of sound, the beauty of tone. Not just putting sound together, but bringing out the beauty in every single one. And that’s an art that is completely lost today. For all the fetisihizing of tone, that word has completely lost meaning, and most records today, even those that are well balanced, punchy, well mixed, are UGLY sounding. I feel people have forgotten why they mix – they’ve replaced all kinds of dry, abstract technical and intellectual considerations – stock wider, stock punchier, etc. – for all feeling, assessment and understanding of sound, the emotional quality of pieces, and the contribution each sound needs to have in the wider picture. They talk about “character” but what they mean is usually aggressive mangling and lo-fi-ing, which, paradoxically, was never a goal in the analog era, quite the contrary.

    The thing is, if you wake me up and ask what I’m a fan of, analog or digital, I’ll answer without even taking a breath `analog` – all the way, there’s not even a doubt in my mind. But I’ve never worked on a large format mixing console, with the entire analog signal chain – tape machines, racks – in my life. Ever. I’m aware of the irony. I’ve experimented with stuff, I know what it does, but had it not been for DAWs and plugins, I would not be making music. Period.

    And there’s also the convenience. An analog studio is an operation. You can’t do it by yourself. Think only about the cleaning and maintenance – repairs, etc.

    Once sound is taken care of, it’s also a matter of convenience and accessibility – both physical and financial. If no “analog” plugins existed, given the option, I’d prefer the fully analog studio. I’d curse my days sometimes, because of administrative stuff, all the unglamorous hassle that doesn’t get mentioned, I’d accept the limitations, I’d take the definitive character of any recording, I’d go with the complication of getting some operations done. There simply is no replacement for the sound.

    But if I can get the sound completely in the box, with all the options, and with the added convenience, accessibility, and extra possibilities, I’d stick to the DAW. Once the sound is achieved, there’s no beating the convenience and the possibilities – not to mention the budgets.

    Add a good mixing console replacement controller – that’s still a challenge to implement, for some impossible to understand reason – and you have that solved, too. Working with a mouse vs. an ergonomically designed console is a complete joke. That will be my next step, to put it in a lot of hours and try to solve, when I get the time, hopefully soon. For some reason, the recording device industry doesn’t yet feel a dedicated, accessible, mixing controller to replace a console isn’t a necessity, and it can be replaced with make shift devices – like a mouse. DAWs need to have a dedicated mixer, with all the tools, not just Pro Tools effects boxes – some already do, like Cakewalk, Reason and Harrison, and a full mixing controller needs to be a tool in itself, that you buy just like you buy the software, completely integrated to operate the mixer, just like a console. It can be a small format 8 track that allows you to quickly flip through buckets maybe with modular buckets that can be coupled to extend the main unit – something like that.

    Sound wise, for now, amps seem to be hard to simulate well, mostly the fizz, the mud, the inertial low end, and the flatness, that you just don’t get with good miking on the real thing – depending mostly on the cab simulation options. But overall, I feel the sound of the analog world in the box problem is close to being solved. There is stuff out there – plugins – that sounds exceptionally well, and overall the industry of plugins still hasn’t gotten to perfectly replicating the vibe of analog and sweetening the sound as well, but it’s very close. Very, very close, for the best of them.

    I just hope the last inches of this gap will be bridged – it would be the biggest shame in the recording industry’s existence if that sound was lost with the dusk of the analog age – along with controller integration, and you’ve got the best of both worlds in the DAW.

    So with that condition, of sound, which is not negotiable, DAWs for me, which is almost a personal disappointment, because I adore the romantism of that era – even hyped as it is, there really was genuine romance and adventure in it, which will be forever lost.

    Great question.

    Reply
  201. Andrew Shchannikov

    on November 22, 2021 7:04 pm

    No way.

    Reply
  202. Samir

    on November 22, 2021 7:06 pm

    No, I don’t

    Reply
  203. Chris

    on November 22, 2021 7:07 pm

    No I wouldn’t. I lived through the analogue scene once, already!

    Reply
  204. Ron Music

    on November 22, 2021 7:07 pm

    it depends on the goal 😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃

    Reply
  205. Lykouras Athanasios

    on November 22, 2021 7:08 pm

    Not in any case ..

    Reply
  206. @dafingaz

    on November 22, 2021 7:10 pm

    No. I like to created while on the go (vacations, traveling, out with the family).

    That would be really hard in an all analog world. 😳🤣

    Reply
  207. Deggsy

    on November 22, 2021 7:10 pm

    It’s a no from me .

    Reply
  208. Giuseppe

    on November 22, 2021 7:12 pm

    No, thanks!

    Reply
  209. Claudio Marcozzi

    on November 22, 2021 7:14 pm

    Definitely no!

    Reply
  210. Eric

    on November 22, 2021 7:18 pm

    I would…… over my dead body!

    Reply
  211. Samuel NICOLAY

    on November 22, 2021 7:19 pm

    Yes, already done.

    Reply
  212. David

    on November 22, 2021 7:19 pm

    NO
    Mai

    Reply
  213. Jacky

    on November 22, 2021 7:22 pm

    No, I wouldn’t go analog. I’m happy working digitally and it takes up a lot less space :)

    Reply
  214. Robin

    on November 22, 2021 7:23 pm

    No.

    Reply
  215. Jacky

    on November 22, 2021 7:26 pm

    No, I wouldn’t go fully analog. I’m happy working digitally and it takes up a lot less space :)

    Reply
  216. AT

    on November 22, 2021 7:27 pm

    Nope.

    Reply
  217. Arshan

    on November 22, 2021 7:29 pm

    You should check out the tape collection in my stationary drawer :D

    Reply
  218. JT Harris

    on November 22, 2021 7:30 pm

    I don’t think I’d replace one for the other, but I’d sure like to attend the week long Analogue Boot Camp, and see and hear what happens. I do value IK’s products and use many of them frequently.
    Thank BPB!

    Reply
  219. Bogdan Bogdanov

    on November 22, 2021 7:30 pm

    No!

    Reply
  220. Luiz

    on November 22, 2021 7:32 pm

    Maybe half of them :)

    Reply
  221. Alfonso Diaz

    on November 22, 2021 7:33 pm

    No, thanks. I want to have my cake and eat it too! Best of both worlds!

    Reply
  222. BoogieNaught

    on November 22, 2021 7:34 pm

    No,way !
    I’ll mix and make music in the box
    And think outside the box ;-)

    Reply
  223. Sascha

    on November 22, 2021 7:34 pm

    no, never these days.
    I have participated and used the technical development. 4+8 track cassette recorder, tape machine, HD+MD recorder and then computer based recording.
    Not everything is 100% great in the digital age, but I wouldn’t want to miss or trade the possibilities of today.

    Reply
  224. Javier

    on November 22, 2021 7:36 pm

    Not really

    I believe in a few more years the analog will be a complement to the digital one. Digital is getting closer and closer in quality and allows a more exact way of working if needed.

    Reply
  225. Pablo Altés

    on November 22, 2021 7:41 pm

    Why would I when you niw can have best of both worlds ?

    Reply
  226. Philip Arickx

    on November 22, 2021 7:46 pm

    No, probably not.

    Reply
  227. Terra_H

    on November 22, 2021 7:46 pm

    Never. <3.

    Reply
  228. Not Bill

    on November 22, 2021 7:47 pm

    If I was Bill Gates. Sure, why not.

    Reply
  229. Isaías Muñoz

    on November 22, 2021 7:50 pm

    No, la verdad no… Mas bien sería una combinación entre lo análogo y lo digital!!

    Reply
  230. Nick Brand

    on November 22, 2021 7:51 pm

    No, digital is the future. flexible and more possibilities.

    Reply
  231. Nicolás Zeballos

    on November 22, 2021 7:52 pm

    i would not change, digital studio has more options to offer than analog studio.

    Reply
  232. Simon Oxblod

    on November 22, 2021 7:54 pm

    I would. If I could afford it. I would love to work old school with tapes and spring reverbs and such. But it’s but a dream.

    Reply
  233. hammerpocket

    on November 22, 2021 7:55 pm

    If I could have the hardware equivalent of all the plugins I have (an SSL desk, LA2As, 1176s, Fairchild 670, grand piano, Mellotron, Hammond B3, Wurlitzer 200A, a collection of classic synths, practically every guitar amp known to man, bass guitars, drums, orchestral instruments of all types, great recording rooms, plate reverb, etc., etc., etc.), then.. well, no, I still don’t think I would give up digital recording!

    Reply
  234. Patrick Osterday

    on November 22, 2021 7:56 pm

    No. Cool idea, but need to be mobile too much these days and rely on my laptop!

    Reply
  235. Nikola

    on November 22, 2021 7:56 pm

    Well,no.I think its best to go with the time and go digital.

    Reply
  236. Andreas Gassber

    on November 22, 2021 7:57 pm

    No, to much stuff to maintain.

    Reply
  237. Demetrios

    on November 22, 2021 8:00 pm

    Yes, and here is why. If I lose access to the Internet or cannot use it in certain spaces, I cannot use or download a lot of digital functions.

    Each layer of dependence you add to the process jeopardizes your ability to be creative in the future. One should have no anxieties when they create.

    Reply
  238. Cam

    on November 22, 2021 8:01 pm

    I wouldn’t substitute digital for analog, only because digital is more efficient, even though analog has the character & tone that I want. My dream is to have a hybrid of the two

    Reply
  239. Alexandr Solovyov

    on November 22, 2021 8:03 pm

    No, but it’s interesting to try

    Reply
  240. Chris Thomas

    on November 22, 2021 8:07 pm

    Replace? No chance. That said, I am shopping for an old tape machine to supplement my setup :) These plugins would make for a fun comparison.

    Reply
  241. Jawnson

    on November 22, 2021 8:08 pm

    No. However having a hybrid workflow would be something i’d rather go for

    Reply
  242. Dave Younger

    on November 22, 2021 8:11 pm

    No I wouldn’t. I had enough of that “back in the day” :)

    Reply
  243. Mike Herrera

    on November 22, 2021 8:12 pm

    No, definitivamente no sería posible, sería un sueño claro, pero no creo que sea posible, crecí completamente en el mundo Digital, no podría entrar a un mundo Analógico, quizá podría tener algunos equipos que brinde ese sonido pero enteramente dejar lo digital, creo sería imposible y poco sustentable.

    Reply
  244. Shane

    on November 22, 2021 8:26 pm

    Mmmmmm. honestly i wouldnt.

    The things were able to do now itb i couldnt let that go to go full analog.

    Reply
  245. Sidder Spinsel

    on November 22, 2021 8:27 pm

    no. i love analog, but digital is to comfotable (and less expensive).

    Reply
  246. Dino

    on November 22, 2021 8:27 pm

    No I would never haha not entirely, that’s a step backwards!

    Reply
  247. Augustto Queiroz

    on November 22, 2021 8:38 pm

    No.

    Reply
  248. Belman

    on November 22, 2021 8:39 pm

    Muy difícil, ya que el proceso de audio digital cada vez va tomando mayor fuerza y hay muchas mejoras 👌 Aunque es difícil sustituir un equipo analógico, hay varios plugins hoy en día que hacen muy buenas emulaciones ¡¡
    Mientras tanto seguiremos trabajado el Audio Digital ¡¡

    Pdta. Buena reseña de las Cintas ¡¡ 👌

    Reply
  249. Bajista Mendoza

    on November 22, 2021 8:40 pm

    Creo que es muy difícil ¡¡
    Hoy en día se pueden hacer muchas cosas similare con Software y Plugins Digital mente ¡¡

    Reply
  250. Dimaslavsky

    on November 22, 2021 8:41 pm

    If there was such a person who would agree to sponsor me, throw money into my orchestra and buy me analog equipment instead of my plug-ins, I would definitely not refuse.
    and then I would have safely sold all this and flew to the Mekong Delta, because I had never been there.

    Reply
  251. Viktor

    on November 22, 2021 8:44 pm

    you need to take the best of both worlds ) so, supplement – yes, completely replace – no

    Reply
  252. Nicolas Hourquet

    on November 22, 2021 8:46 pm

    Mais non de non, gain de place, de temp et permet d expérimenté, plus de chose, ik best.

    Reply
  253. Niall Byrne

    on November 22, 2021 8:46 pm

    No. Digital offers too many possibilities to take it totally out of the mix.

    Reply
  254. Michael

    on November 22, 2021 8:46 pm

    Not entirely, no.
    But I’m working ITB plus a small amount of analog hardware and consumer tapedecks, which are an amazing addition to the whole sound.

    Reply
  255. Scott

    on November 22, 2021 8:49 pm

    If I can a fully analog studio with everything that I wanted (so we are talking an LA recording studio plus) it would be hard to say no. But digital includes a DAW and there is NO way I would splice tape! : )

    Reply
  256. Antonio Iunco

    on November 22, 2021 8:51 pm

    YES! And then I’d sell most part of the analog gear in and reinvest it in acoustics, networking, plugins, marketing and, of course, education!

    Reply
  257. konstantinos

    on November 22, 2021 8:55 pm

    super tape vintage…!!!

    Reply
  258. Kami H

    on November 22, 2021 8:55 pm

    No way !

    Reply
  259. Leslie

    on November 22, 2021 8:55 pm

    Yes!! I would love having analog gear. Obviously will never be able to afford. But yeah.

    Reply
  260. Rodney Lee

    on November 22, 2021 8:56 pm

    No I would not!

    Reply
  261. SFM

    on November 22, 2021 8:58 pm

    Yeah if i had enough money. I’d do in a heartbeat

    Reply
  262. Mario

    on November 22, 2021 9:01 pm

    No Way José!

    Reply
  263. Вадим

    on November 22, 2021 9:05 pm

    Not a chance!

    Reply
  264. Daedalus Wyss

    on November 22, 2021 9:05 pm

    Yes. If I could I would do that.

    I might regret it later, but I’d definitely try it.

    Reply
  265. Osvaldo Morejon

    on November 22, 2021 9:09 pm

    I would not do that. It is just a better workflow for these days having the flexibility and be able to work in any place just usin your basic gear.

    Reply
  266. jo

    on November 22, 2021 9:09 pm

    yes, because why not?

    Reply
  267. Javier Arteaga

    on November 22, 2021 9:10 pm

    If I could afford it…may be

    Reply
  268. Peter Herczeg

    on November 22, 2021 9:11 pm

    excluded

    Reply
  269. Adam Rogers

    on November 22, 2021 9:16 pm

    No. I think digital provides so much flexibility and simplicity (a at least in terms of wiring, connections, power use, heat etc.) A partially malady studio would be nice, but not solely.

    Reply
  270. Norman Stewart

    on November 22, 2021 9:18 pm

    I would not change. Too much versatility with plugins. I can put a different version of a Fairchild compressor on 50 different tracks if I want!

    Reply
  271. mx

    on November 22, 2021 9:19 pm

    i would not substitute software completely, because it is just too handy compared to working analog all the way.
    but the pleasure of turning real potis, also two at a time, will always make me do certain things with hardware, though it doesnt have to be analog inside.

    Reply
  272. Mr Olu

    on November 22, 2021 9:20 pm

    No, not completely, but mostly…about 70% analog and 30% digital. However, I would definitely insist on all vintage analog consoles. I still can’t get over the drastic difference in sound and character between analog boards and digital ones.Would definitely want real Leslie speakers and old school reverb units

    Reply
  273. Al F

    on November 22, 2021 9:24 pm

    Analog sound is now at our reach with all the incredible plugins we have. The digital workflow is so much better that I couldn’t think about changing how I work right now.

    Reply
  274. Alex Vitkovsky

    on November 22, 2021 9:25 pm

    No, I wouldn’t. My digital studio suits me!

    Reply
  275. Rave Sbor

    on November 22, 2021 9:26 pm

    Probably not

    Reply
  276. Ori

    on November 22, 2021 9:26 pm

    If I had the space I think I would.
    Always loved to the analog feeling :)

    Reply
  277. Arath Adriel

    on November 22, 2021 9:27 pm

    I think if I had the opportunity and the economy acceptable, I would. I think that despite being used to working in digital, I believe that it is never too late to learn new things, especially as producers, that we are constantly learning and adapting in the musical environment.

    Reply
  278. MIKAEL BIRRAUX

    on November 22, 2021 9:28 pm

    NO

    Reply
  279. Ronald Irawan

    on November 22, 2021 9:29 pm

    Yes, if SSL/API Desk for Analog Summing.

    Reply
  280. Irion Da Ronin

    on November 22, 2021 9:41 pm

    I wouldn’t change my way to make music or workflow, that would mean more time invested, and i want focus my time in making music, not learning new stuff, or even buying stuff.

    Have a nice day and good luck everyone! :)

    Reply
  281. Leo

    on November 22, 2021 9:43 pm

    Both digital and analog have their own merits. I want to use it on a case-by-case basis. So sometimes it’s completely analog, sometimes it’s completely digital, and sometimes it’s a mix of both. But with the amazing T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection, it may be possible to move completely to digital. Give me a present to verify that!!

    Reply
  282. Juanca Estremadoyro

    on November 22, 2021 9:44 pm

    Analógico totalmente no! un sistema híbrido considero que es mucho más versátil y flexible

    Reply
  283. RedBaron

    on November 22, 2021 9:44 pm

    Hybrid is a desirable option for two worlds meeting. A complete Analogue set up would bring the comforting heat and energy from the components. Not forgetting the distinct smell of valves and transformers cooking before air con was prevalent.

    Reply
  284. Nicolas Fournier

    on November 22, 2021 9:50 pm

    Not a chance!

    Reply
    • Tomislav Zlatic

      on December 6, 2021 2:34 pm

      You won the giveaway. Congratulations! :) Please check your inbox.

      Reply
  285. Luis Mario Magaña

    on November 22, 2021 9:56 pm

    Yes!! i love analog hardware, i recorded many music on Tascam analog and digital machines, i have a Tascam M-160 on my studio and cassette recorders, tape machines. Yes!

    Reply
  286. Patrick

    on November 22, 2021 9:57 pm

    No, I would not

    Reply
  287. Marcelo Ribeiro Simões

    on November 22, 2021 9:58 pm

    At the first time, no, I would not.
    But it depends on what analog items I could have.
    Studer(s), SSL(s), etc. could make me tempted… ;-)

    Reply
  288. the intern

    on November 22, 2021 10:00 pm

    Yes, absolutely!

    Reply
  289. Stefano Papetti

    on November 22, 2021 10:00 pm

    It wouldn’t make any sense to discard all the convenience and advantages of digital audio. Still, a lot of nice hardware is also becoming affordable, and it’s great that I could add a few devices to my setup lately, especially synths and drum machines. I still feel the connection with a hardware unit cannot be overcome by software.

    Reply
  290. LEONOR GELEN RAYMUNDO ACUÑA

    on November 22, 2021 10:00 pm

    I would like to compare digital sound with analog sound.

    Reply
  291. Stefano

    on November 22, 2021 10:01 pm

    It wouldn’t make any sense to discard all the convenience and advantages of digital audio. Still, a lot of nice hardware is also becoming affordable, and it’s great that I could add a few devices to my setup lately, especially synths and drum machines. I still feel the connection with a hardware unit cannot be overcome by software.

    Reply
  292. juan motta

    on November 22, 2021 10:01 pm

    Noooooo!!!!

    Reply
  293. Falko Freund

    on November 22, 2021 10:03 pm

    No 🤣😀😅

    Reply
  294. Davor Brijačak

    on November 22, 2021 10:08 pm

    No, never!

    Reply
  295. ELZURIX

    on November 22, 2021 10:11 pm

    No, maintaining it will probably be a nightmare

    Reply
  296. Max Trone

    on November 22, 2021 10:15 pm

    I would if I could get over my fear of using an analog sequencer!

    Reply
  297. Jay Kekkonen

    on November 22, 2021 10:23 pm

    Nah too expensive and digital workflow is much better. Best of both worlds tho.

    Reply
  298. Michael

    on November 22, 2021 10:27 pm

    No, I’m thinking about adding something of the analog world, but to ban using ITB stuff in 21 century is crazy!

    Reply
  299. Jonathan Paris

    on November 22, 2021 10:28 pm

    I would provided i had an assistant to do all my session recalls :P

    Reply
  300. Michael

    on November 22, 2021 10:37 pm

    Maybe… I mean, I don’t have enough space here for a full analog studio, but if it would come with a house built around it, I would take it.

    Reply
  301. Adnan

    on November 22, 2021 10:57 pm

    No, not completely at least.

    Reply
  302. Chris Krupa

    on November 22, 2021 10:59 pm

    It’s a nice thought, but no, been there in the nineties and it was too damn hard :)

    Reply
  303. Pedro Ronquillo

    on November 22, 2021 10:59 pm

    La verdad seria muy bueno equipo analógico porque nada es mejor que lo original, en este caso los equipos, pero creo que al usar complementos digitales tienes mas facilidades por ejemplo tener el mismo complemento en cada canal que en analógico no se puede y además de la movilidad que tienes al usar complementos digitales que te permite trabajar de varios lugares muy fácil y con muy buena calidad, así que me quedo con complementos digitales.

    Reply
  304. GILVAN RIBEIRO COSTA

    on November 22, 2021 11:01 pm

    I wouldn’t change it, because I wouldn’t be able to pay for all the maintenance expenses, even more than the customers are not paying for us to keep everything analog. I would even work with something else 80% of the digital suits me.

    Reply
  305. Music ByIan

    on November 22, 2021 11:03 pm

    No. I’m old enough to remember when the hiss, warble and analogue goodness was unwanted. Nevermind the worn tape heads, and chewed up tapes.

    Reply
  306. Chris Share

    on November 22, 2021 11:04 pm

    No.

    Reply
  307. Radosław Osypiuk

    on November 22, 2021 11:05 pm

    Yes I do. It’s because when I use DAW and plugins I very often mix with my eyes unfortunately… And I think it isn’t a good habit.

    Reply
  308. Christian Bock

    on November 22, 2021 11:12 pm

    No, I would not. :-)

    Reply
  309. Suny Chapon

    on November 22, 2021 11:12 pm

    No, I wouldn’t. I’d rather have a hybrid solution.

    Reply
  310. Abner Khuzwayo

    on November 22, 2021 11:18 pm

    No chance I would😂

    Reply
  311. Mauricio Mallmann

    on November 22, 2021 11:21 pm

    No. :)

    Reply
  312. gabriel salgado

    on November 22, 2021 11:23 pm

    si, la experiencia palpable siempre es mejor, igual el ultimo eslabon de la cadena, hoy, siempre es digital.

    Reply
  313. Giordano Conti

    on November 22, 2021 11:25 pm

    Not completely, but … why not? if it sounds good….I would definitely integrate analog to digital

    Reply
  314. Bogdan Sinchenko

    on November 22, 2021 11:28 pm

    I would not completely replace it, but I also wanted to have analog devices.

    Reply
  315. Wesley gardner

    on November 22, 2021 11:29 pm

    No to much work. But I think the people that are doing a remote studio were you can control the equipment from anywhere while sending audio in is outstanding!

    Reply
  316. Thomas

    on November 22, 2021 11:36 pm

    Only if it fit in my rucksack

    Reply
  317. bart walravens

    on November 22, 2021 11:37 pm

    Only if the A studio came with a technician to keep everything in working order…..oh, ànd a coffee maker! Can’t do analogue without coffee!

    Reply
  318. Ben

    on November 22, 2021 11:38 pm

    I don’t think I would go completely analog. I prefer the workflow of ITB mixing and there are a few AI-assisted plugins I would like to keep using. I’d definitely like to add some analog preamps and distortion tools though

    Reply
  319. andrea

    on November 22, 2021 11:39 pm

    No, I wouldn’t. First of all, I used to own an all-analog studio back in the 1990s, and although I loved it, I remember very well all the obstacles and limitations I had to cope with. First, in order to operate analog gear, you need money and plenty of time to maintain it properly. You never know what and when is going to break down and whether you will be able to fix it on your own. Besides, even if we like the “analog sound” and try to add a little bit of noise to the sterile digital sound, we have to keep in mind that noise was a real curse of the analog domain and we used to dream of purity offered by DAWs. DAWs are simply easier for reasons we usually don’t even think about these days. Last but not least, the analog studio — at least the incarnation of it we could afford ’cause the majority of us wasn’t awfully rich — was never as flexible as an avarage DAW. The number of things you can do in a box, possible routings, instances of a single plugin you can use, finally the accessibility of plugins doing literally anything you dream of for free or for a fraction of the price of a hardware processor makes a real difference if you think about it. Hence I’d always pick a modern DAW today, maybe with some necessary hardware if I really needed it, but frankly speaking I try to keep things as simple as possible. With plugins being better and better you can do a lot and more, for less and in a limited space of your bedroom. With demanding and pricy hardware life isn’t always better. It’s just my two cents though.

    Reply
  320. Nacho Ruiz

    on November 22, 2021 11:41 pm

    No!

    Reply
  321. jonas souza

    on November 22, 2021 11:52 pm

    If I had money, yes!

    Reply
  322. Kacper Żarna

    on November 22, 2021 11:55 pm

    Not at this point in my path – i’d need to gain a lot of knowledge beforehand!

    Reply
  323. Youri

    on November 22, 2021 11:58 pm

    Yes, absolutely !

    Reply
  324. JoeB

    on November 23, 2021 12:13 am

    I would not go analog. I don’t have the space. As long as plugins like the Tascam Series are developed, there is no reason to go back to analog.

    Reply
  325. Alex

    on November 23, 2021 12:18 am

    No. I would like to have best of both worlds!

    Reply
  326. Aaron

    on November 23, 2021 12:23 am

    si y no , si por que seria un sueño y no por que no tengo un estudio y tal ves jamas lo tenga xd

    Reply
  327. Alberto Lucendo

    on November 23, 2021 12:24 am

    the fun of performance with the buttons and the touch of the gear is hard to get just with plugins, but everytime plugins are sounding better and better and affordable and also good looking :) so it’s becaming a compromise ant tempting to mobr to a mostly digital enviroment.

    Reply
  328. yokyun

    on November 23, 2021 12:29 am

    PING PONG Recording!

    Reply
  329. Anastasiya

    on November 23, 2021 12:29 am

    No

    Reply
  330. Lucas Cordeiro

    on November 23, 2021 12:30 am

    Yes I would switch because my favorite albums were recorded in analogue studios

    Reply
  331. JEFFERSON ALMEIDA

    on November 23, 2021 12:34 am

    creo que lo haría en un 50/50 digital y hardware para sacar lo mejor de ambos mundos

    Reply
  332. Richard Weeks

    on November 23, 2021 12:40 am

    I’d love to but I think hybrid is the most practical these days for me. That said, why not both!?

    Reply
  333. Tiago Herbert de Araujo

    on November 23, 2021 12:40 am

    Não trocaria todos. Pois a manutenção dos analógicos é muito cara.

    Reply
  334. Xavier

    on November 23, 2021 12:54 am

    Nope, there’s a sound reason why, lol.

    Reply
  335. Greg

    on November 23, 2021 12:56 am

    No, I wouldn’t

    Reply
  336. Timothy

    on November 23, 2021 12:57 am

    i would if i submitted an indie track type for mastering..for artists like finneas or the neighbourhood

    Reply
  337. Quim Mandado

    on November 23, 2021 1:11 am

    No, I don’t

    Reply
  338. ege

    on November 23, 2021 1:20 am

    Of course i would haha

    Reply
  339. Edison Rosa

    on November 23, 2021 1:35 am

    I’d like to, but I wouldn’t have enough money to do that. So I’d keep digital.

    Reply
  340. Kyle Pivarnik

    on November 23, 2021 1:38 am

    Yes, I absolutely would!

    Reply
  341. Joe L.

    on November 23, 2021 1:45 am

    Back in the day I would go full analog in a heartbeat… but now, no I wouldn’t… everything has become so streamlined there’s no going back.

    Reply
  342. Luiz

    on November 23, 2021 1:50 am

    Sim

    Reply
  343. MIchel Assunção

    on November 23, 2021 1:51 am

    Não trocaria de jeito nenhum! Não teria espaço no meu quarto!!!

    Reply
  344. Terry Sanders

    on November 23, 2021 2:02 am

    No, there’s enough to keep me me busy with updates, new plugins, etc. While the hardware would be sweet and from my age group and time, the possible wiring/routing hassles, parts repair, cost factor, etc. would no longer be worth the trade off.

    Reply
  345. jeyz1176

    on November 23, 2021 2:05 am

    No, I could never go back.
    Nevertheless I religiously keep my analog equipment … Do we ever know 😅

    Reply
  346. mayito

    on November 23, 2021 2:15 am

    I love my gear, don’t think I can go fully analog anytime soon!

    Reply
  347. Ashish Vineeth Manuel

    on November 23, 2021 2:17 am

    No, I don’t

    Reply
  348. Vladimir

    on November 23, 2021 2:17 am

    nope

    Reply
  349. Eye Jaw

    on November 23, 2021 2:22 am

    I don’t think I could permanently work with a strictly analog studio.

    Reply
  350. imoyes

    on November 23, 2021 2:24 am

    I have gone from fully analogue recording (when I started there was no option!) to pretty much fully digital recording (my guitars & voice are still analogue!), and I have no intention of going back! :-)

    Reply
  351. David N

    on November 23, 2021 2:24 am

    Yes, I would – if by some unexpected miracle I suddenly became rich enough.
    Until then, I’ll stick with a hybrid approach, while my last remaining tape cassette machines
    continue to survive on their last legs.

    Reply
  352. Pablo Osso

    on November 23, 2021 2:28 am

    I guess I don’t but if I ID ont have any option, of course I’d have a full analog studio

    Reply
  353. Alexandre Munhoz Scherer

    on November 23, 2021 3:08 am

    Acho que não trocaria pelo fato da manutenção. Hoje em dia é bastante complicado já no ITB a manutenção, o que dirá no analógico.

    Reply
  354. Anderson Girotto

    on November 23, 2021 3:27 am

    Yes, I would.

    Reply
  355. Ramin Jafarzadegan

    on November 23, 2021 3:28 am

    I don’t think so

    Reply
  356. Frank Wilson

    on November 23, 2021 3:36 am

    No, I don’t

    Reply
  357. Daniel Guerra

    on November 23, 2021 3:43 am

    Sería un sueño algo así, espero poder lograrlo.

    Reply
  358. Francisco Porras

    on November 23, 2021 3:44 am

    no !! never !! !!

    Reply
  359. James

    on November 23, 2021 3:49 am

    No, I wouldn’t. It would be tempting but not being able to switch between projects would be a nightmare. Recalls and all that. And much more expensive

    Reply
  360. Martin Victor

    on November 23, 2021 4:03 am

    I firmly believe in the digital recording realm and I’d never want to leave it after learning it, using it and reaping its benefits for 20 years. That said, I also believe in analog instruments and prefer them to their digital counterparts. Tube amps for guitars and basses, and tube preamps in Hammond organs and Leslie speakers. I love acoustic drums too. I have heard newer Roland electronic drums that sound quite good though, and would give serious consideration to using that type of kit and forego the nightmare of microphone setup and drum tuning to achieve that killer drum sound. And I do have a digital piano which sounds great too. It certainly beats paying for a piano tuner.

    Reply
  361. Alexander León

    on November 23, 2021 4:28 am

    Of course, today it has been demonstrated that software has elements that hardware does not and that it is possible to mimic the behavior of hardware.

    Reply
  362. Roberto Alves

    on November 23, 2021 4:29 am

    No, I don’t.
    But a mix between the both worlds is the best option!

    Reply
  363. n4m

    on November 23, 2021 4:29 am

    i like having the best of both worlds

    Reply
  364. Regis Caron

    on November 23, 2021 4:50 am

    I would definitely

    Reply
  365. AM

    on November 23, 2021 5:10 am

    I ll try if dint like I ll switch back .

    Reply
  366. Miguel Angel Rodriguez

    on November 23, 2021 5:11 am

    No I do not. Because today technology is so advanced that the difference between digital and analog is minimal.

    Reply
  367. Michael Le Du

    on November 23, 2021 5:14 am

    I would not. Digital is too convenient and the difference isn’t going to be noticeable to the average listener.

    Reply
  368. Arnold Ulloa

    on November 23, 2021 5:16 am

    No, considero que las emulaciones de plugins de UAD, aparte de ser mas económicas, tienen un sonido mas fiel al original. Tal vez compre algunos complementos análogos, pero no sustituirlos al 100%

    Reply
  369. Mibrilane

    on November 23, 2021 5:26 am

    Probably not, editing in digital is just so easy. Analog would force choices, though, and sometimes that’s a good thing.

    Reply
  370. Alex

    on November 23, 2021 6:08 am

    Not sure I could trade the digital for an analog studio. Maybe like a simple eight track tape recorder. That’d be pretty dope.

    Reply
  371. Joel Glaser

    on November 23, 2021 6:10 am

    Would I ever substitute my digital studio for an entirely analog one? Well, no. Quite frankly, I love the analog gear that I own, but software and digital gear is getting better every year. There may be some that can afford to buy and maintain analog bits, but most of us don’t have that budget. And truthfully, most of us aren’t making the types of recordings where it would make any noticeable difference.
    Thanks for putting the BPB newsletter together. I do enjoy it.
    Happy Holidays!

    Reply
  372. Charles B

    on November 23, 2021 6:15 am

    Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?
    – Now that plugins like these are already created, there’s no need for an entirely analog setup. Gosh, that TASCAM Porta One is the only missing piece in my low-end digital setup! Thank you IK, thank you Bedroom Producer Blog! ( I visit your site everyday! )

    Reply
  373. Simbarashe Motsi

    on November 23, 2021 6:24 am

    I would have both, the best of both worlds. That said i can do without the hardware.

    Reply
  374. Giovanni Berto

    on November 23, 2021 6:42 am

    To be honest, no

    Reply
  375. Alexandr

    on November 23, 2021 6:47 am

    No. But I would buy something from the analogue. All the same, the sound is captured in the analogue part. However, with regard to processing – only ITB.

    Reply
  376. Eve Ripper

    on November 23, 2021 6:52 am

    I would try that to make sure it’s good or bad

    Reply
  377. Pavel Gorlovoy

    on November 23, 2021 6:58 am

    Maybe yes. At least to work on some special project.
    For everyday use – this would not work in today’s realities.

    Reply
  378. Kurauwone Maponga

    on November 23, 2021 7:06 am

    No I wouldnt do that. I am now deeply rooted in digital.

    Reply
  379. Alex Vombat

    on November 23, 2021 7:13 am

    No, I would not

    Reply
  380. Krishna Seth

    on November 23, 2021 7:15 am

    No I don’t , this is a digital era of music !

    Reply
  381. Carlos Álvarez Rodriguez

    on November 23, 2021 7:35 am

    No. First at all, I work in home-studio, so my space to hardware is limited. Also, digital emulation is more realible and is hard to damage,

    Reply
  382. Dee Gee

    on November 23, 2021 7:35 am

    If the world resets to 1963, then YES.

    Reply
  383. Jay

    on November 23, 2021 7:36 am

    would you give away your petrol car for an electric one?

    Reply
  384. Chris

    on November 23, 2021 7:47 am

    If space and money were no option, I WOULD trade! but sometimes it would take a few hours to get from one piece of equipment to another…

    Reply
  385. CRISTOBAL

    on November 23, 2021 7:52 am

    No. I’d not.

    Reply
  386. Philipp

    on November 23, 2021 7:54 am

    I would never substitute my digital studio for an entirely analog one…

    Reply
  387. Darren Jennings

    on November 23, 2021 7:58 am

    I wouldn’t swap it completely, as it would hurt my workflow too much. But nothing wrong with an analog tape machine and compressor in my studio one day.

    Reply
  388. Gavs

    on November 23, 2021 8:03 am

    Nope. No space for an analogue studio.

    Reply
  389. Eliot

    on November 23, 2021 8:06 am

    Nope, way to used to the convenience!

    Reply
  390. Fernando

    on November 23, 2021 8:21 am

    No, I think with such a busy schedule there is only so much time for me personally to make music. The quality in low end is closer than ever before to emulate analog and the fun of spending a weekend purchasing plugins is in itself a wonder! The resolution and quality of emulations is amazing for sure!
    Thank you for this blog and IK for your amazing software!

    Reply
  391. Clay LaHatte

    on November 23, 2021 8:37 am

    “Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?”

    I don’t think so.

    Reply
  392. Dennis

    on November 23, 2021 8:38 am

    No, although analog sounds awesome, I wouldn’t step back. Digital has too many advantages :-)

    Reply
  393. Lars

    on November 23, 2021 8:41 am

    Probably only when i have the money to buy a big house with enough roomspace to put in all that analogue gear

    Reply
  394. shun

    on November 23, 2021 9:13 am

    Yes I do.

    Reply
  395. yambu

    on November 23, 2021 9:15 am

    yes I would, because I come from the analogy era. But I also don’t want to do without a digital studio anymore. I like both. Can you forgive me?

    Reply
  396. Black

    on November 23, 2021 9:24 am

    I never try, but, I would love to reserch more tone of sound to create more song’s styles.

    Reply
  397. Leo Wieber

    on November 23, 2021 9:25 am

    No I wouldn’t, it is great that we can use both digital and analog nowadays (and its impressive to see how good digitally emulated analog gear has become !

    Reply
  398. Váradi Ádám

    on November 23, 2021 9:28 am

    No, digital is the future. smaller environment pollution important too.

    Reply
  399. Andrew Hall

    on November 23, 2021 9:47 am

    Never say never…!

    Reply
  400. Segun Adigun

    on November 23, 2021 9:51 am

    no

    Reply
  401. Jason

    on November 23, 2021 9:52 am

    If I have the real deal equipment ? Sure. I could see people who are making music in the box not living this idea, but having full on tape with a good board and all the outboard ? It would be like recording with Steve Albini in Electrical Audio.

    Reply
  402. Alex

    on November 23, 2021 9:54 am

    Entering contest and answering : no, I would never play it 100% Analog !

    Reply
  403. yiyao

    on November 23, 2021 10:17 am

    No, I would not

    Reply
  404. Guo

    on November 23, 2021 10:21 am

    Nope~

    Reply
  405. Emmieeee

    on November 23, 2021 10:28 am

    I don’t think it’d be great for my music, short term. Swapping to 100% analogue would be a huge adjustment and not something I’m motivated to do. If it was more of a case of working alongside someone who knows the equipment and getting an opportunity to try a different way of working and learn from others then, yeah, absolutely. Never say never, and all that.

    Reply
  406. Matt

    on November 23, 2021 10:33 am

    No.

    Reply
  407. Bsprt

    on November 23, 2021 10:38 am

    Simple answer: no way. I would first have to learn how to cope with analogue equipment from the scratch, I guess. And then have the money and space to aquire and place the equipment. That’s not realistic for me.

    Reply
  408. Corey

    on November 23, 2021 10:47 am

    No, probably not. It’s best to appreciate and utilise both for what they each do best.

    Reply
  409. Tim Fialka

    on November 23, 2021 10:55 am

    It makes no sense to change everything to analog, but some things remain unique.

    Reply
  410. Matthias

    on November 23, 2021 10:55 am

    Na, I wouldn t do that : )

    Reply
  411. Sven

    on November 23, 2021 11:06 am

    Ich würde bestimmte Komponenten weiterhin analog bevorzugen ( z.B. Compressor). Viele andere, wie z.B. Synthis können ruhig digital sein. Der ideale Weg ist eine Mischung aus beiden. Das ist jedenfalls der aktuelle Stand. Vielleicht ist es in Zukunft wieder anders und die analogen Komponenten verschwinden komplett. Interessant wird auch wie sich die KI in diesem Bereich zukünftig entwickeln wird.

    Reply
  412. Oleksii Kalashnyk

    on November 23, 2021 11:40 am

    No

    Reply
  413. Thorsten Meinhardt

    on November 23, 2021 11:43 am

    There’s no way back;)

    Reply
  414. Sami

    on November 23, 2021 11:46 am

    Thanks

    Reply
  415. Kevin Ingham

    on November 23, 2021 11:59 am

    I wish I could afford to, so no, it’s very unlikely, but I wish I could have more analogue gear as it’s so much fun to play with tactile equipment.

    Reply
  416. Arnaud

    on November 23, 2021 12:08 pm

    Yes, I will perhaps, one day, reuse my Tascam 244, 4 tracks cassette recorder !

    Reply
  417. KING BOLART

    on November 23, 2021 12:19 pm

    NO, I WOULD NOT.

    Reply
  418. Mike

    on November 23, 2021 12:19 pm

    Couldn’t go fully analogue in this day and age. Digital is just too convenient!

    Reply
  419. Angie Angel

    on November 23, 2021 12:30 pm

    I maybe would if could afford it

    Reply
  420. Szilárd K.

    on November 23, 2021 12:32 pm

    No I would not.

    Reply
  421. pedro sanchez

    on November 23, 2021 12:35 pm

    I Don’t know but it sounds attractive, having all this beautiful machines around

    Reply
  422. Dmitry

    on November 23, 2021 12:56 pm

    Maybe

    Reply
  423. Oberst

    on November 23, 2021 1:02 pm

    No. Digital got a lot of advantages and is much cheaper.

    Reply
  424. gra

    on November 23, 2021 1:10 pm

    No, I would not

    Reply
  425. LU

    on November 23, 2021 1:23 pm

    no nn I would, it would be nice to have everything analog but the power of digital is now almost unbeatable nowadays, it never fails, I put as many as I want and if I knew how to use they give perhaps better results than the old analog

    Reply
  426. Gunnar

    on November 23, 2021 1:30 pm

    I would not leave my digital studio, because of the comfort to recall everything, what is not possible in a total analog envirounment.

    Reply
  427. Klaus

    on November 23, 2021 1:50 pm

    It would be great to be able to do this. But in 2021 we have the possibility to work around with emulations like the Tape Machines of Ik Multimedia. I think that’s great, too, to be able to combine old school recording with modern producing. It is a very good approach for creativity, really creating something new and not just recalling the good old times.

    Reply
  428. Alexey

    on November 23, 2021 1:55 pm

    No

    Reply
  429. Pedro Deniz

    on November 23, 2021 2:00 pm

    No, I don’t

    Reply
  430. Jacques Boileau

    on November 23, 2021 2:00 pm

    No I would not! I am doing so much more in the digital realm.

    Reply
  431. Javier

    on November 23, 2021 2:27 pm

    I don’t have any, but I would love to use a digital emulation, I can’t afford a real one, and if I could, I’d try to switch to digital because of simplicity

    Reply
  432. Leandro Fernandez

    on November 23, 2021 2:31 pm

    No I would not

    Reply
  433. Denis

    on November 23, 2021 2:38 pm

    Actually yes, but only because I have dry eyes and staring at a computer screen for hours is not good for me (but I’m still staring :-) )

    Reply
  434. Anthony Junior

    on November 23, 2021 2:47 pm

    Having T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection in my arsenal is as well having analogue in my digital box, so what else? what is Analogue again? no substitution any more and save space ,

    Reply
  435. Matt

    on November 23, 2021 2:52 pm

    Yes I would, then I’d sell all that lovely gear and with teary eyes get myself setup with a killer mobile digital setup so that I could work while traveling. I think as much as I love analogue gear it still doesn’t compare to being in studio with a talented new artist, in a city you’ve never been to before exploring the one thing that brings us all together… the process of making music!

    Reply
  436. Ardon

    on November 23, 2021 3:04 pm

    Maybe for certain Analogue gear but predominantly would be still all ITB!

    Reply
  437. R

    on November 23, 2021 3:16 pm

    analog tape echo!!

    Reply
  438. HPN

    on November 23, 2021 3:18 pm

    If money ain’t no issue, I would! Cause it would take so much cpu to achieve fully analog result. Analog recordings can convert to any bit modern Technology offers, just like tape movies are now in 4k or 8k.

    Reply
  439. Andy

    on November 23, 2021 3:21 pm

    I wouldn’t mainly because of the automation and recall features of the entire signal chain.

    Reply
  440. Gioacchino

    on November 23, 2021 3:28 pm

    Entirely analog one? Too expensive and complex for a home studio.
    Of course you can add some hardware in some case to improve your music.
    Anyway thanks to bpb and ik multimedia for the giveaway.
    Cheers!

    Reply
  441. Ashley Marlow

    on November 23, 2021 3:34 pm

    To be honest I kinda would! All the limitations and charm analog midi devices have would make my workflow a little simpler, and probably could get some nice oldskool jungle with a little practice. Ambient and noise sessions would be amazing in a analog-only studio too :D

    Reply
  442. Frank Taylor

    on November 23, 2021 3:36 pm

    No. I guess I’m addicted to the software convenience

    Reply
  443. SorooshMHS

    on November 23, 2021 3:45 pm

    I would not

    Reply
  444. Lukas J. Knaup

    on November 23, 2021 4:15 pm

    Would I replace my digital studio with an entirely analog one? No. Reason being the ease of using a daw. Thats not to say I don’t love being hands on, I think Im more creative hands on and ultimately I would love a hybrid studio! Ah one day…

    So many entries for this giveaway. Good luck everyone!

    Reply
  445. Fabio

    on November 23, 2021 4:24 pm

    sorry, no

    Reply
  446. Sinan oğuz

    on November 23, 2021 4:30 pm

    Yes I would like to use

    Reply
  447. Progtronic

    on November 23, 2021 4:41 pm

    Nope…

    Used my old hardware studio for years. Things I had to deal with on a daily basis were bad cables/connections, backing up individual devices samples, programs, sequence data & whatnot… and just generally trying to get things sounding the same from the previous days session.

    Once I went digital… I went all-in, in-the-box… and haven’t looked back.

    Reply
  448. Johnathan Glass

    on November 23, 2021 4:51 pm

    I couldn’t at this point, even though I started on tape in a fully analog studio in 2000.

    Reply
  449. Johnathan Glass

    on November 23, 2021 4:54 pm

    I couldn’t at this point, even though I started on tape in a fully analog studio in 2000. Digital has too many advantages in speed and flexibility.

    Reply
  450. Ale Kami

    on November 23, 2021 5:06 pm

    Tes, definitively, I would do it. A nice analog gear y much more sweet than a computer setup.

    Reply
  451. Julien

    on November 23, 2021 5:24 pm

    Never. For home studio, mix in the box is perfect :-)

    Reply
  452. Valerio

    on November 23, 2021 5:30 pm

    no, I prefer travelling with my studio in a bag.

    Reply
  453. Charles Kerper

    on November 23, 2021 5:34 pm

    I would and I have. To be stuck in one or the other is bipolar and unnecessary. We have the luxury of living at a time when we have both. I recall the fun of PortaStudios and there was a magic that is not the same with digital; but the same can be said of the reverse.

    Regardless Tascam created some of the most used and loved recorders just prior to the digital revolution and its nice to see them get props.

    Reply
  454. John Murphy

    on November 23, 2021 5:42 pm

    Yes, it might be fun!

    Reply
  455. Rachmann

    on November 23, 2021 5:49 pm

    Yes, I would. There is a sound that an all analog studio would evoke that, although not intrinsically better than the sound achieved by a totally ITB studio, had its own merit and cadre of fans whom prefer that sound.

    Reply
  456. Roberto

    on November 23, 2021 6:00 pm

    No

    Reply
  457. Lorax

    on November 23, 2021 6:04 pm

    No, I’m a totally digital person. I wouldn’t mind digitalizing myself if it was possible.

    Reply
  458. Egons Kronbergs

    on November 23, 2021 6:14 pm

    No, I would not.

    Reply
  459. opoil

    on November 23, 2021 6:29 pm

    Impossible!

    Reply
  460. Arcílio

    on November 23, 2021 6:32 pm

    Yes!

    Reply
  461. Alexey Vasilyev

    on November 23, 2021 6:45 pm

    I think I would prefer hybrid between analog and digital. And it would be more analog and just a little digital.

    Reply
  462. Matías

    on November 23, 2021 6:50 pm

    If, without a doubt, by having digital tools we often focus more on “correcting” and “improving” production factors that may not be the most suitable, with fewer possibilities in the analog environment, it is more important to be well prepared to record and enforce a production only with what is at hand, the execution of the instruments, the production and the audio chain, with these elements should be more than enough.

    Reply
  463. Matías

    on November 23, 2021 6:51 pm

    Yes, of course. Undoubtedly, having digital tools many times we focus more on “correcting” and “improving” production factors that may not be the most suitable, with fewer possibilities in the analog environment, it is more important to be well prepared To record and enforce a production only with what is at hand, the execution of the instruments, the production and the audio chain, with these elements should be more than enough.

    Reply
  464. Riley

    on November 23, 2021 7:08 pm

    Yes, I would substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one.

    Reply
  465. Jael Alesander

    on November 23, 2021 7:08 pm

    Definitivamente no.
    Es buena la combinación de ambos mundos.

    Reply
  466. xul Rether

    on November 23, 2021 7:22 pm

    Couldn’t do it, have done some stuff to tape and would not use it when it comes to editing, may run tracks and mixes to it. I think the method of analog recording is extremely important as the limitations help move things along and kill indecisiveness.

    Reply
  467. Daniel Ene

    on November 23, 2021 8:08 pm

    Yes I will. It will be a new experience for me.

    Reply
  468. stiffmink

    on November 23, 2021 8:14 pm

    yes I would

    Reply
  469. Niklas Meier

    on November 23, 2021 8:36 pm

    No, I’m sure you can do everything in the box.

    Reply
  470. TDOL

    on November 23, 2021 8:54 pm

    No – not enough room in my studio.

    Reply
  471. thingahangwi avheani

    on November 23, 2021 9:16 pm

    no

    Reply
  472. Francesco

    on November 23, 2021 9:17 pm

    No, I like software more.

    Reply
  473. Francesco

    on November 23, 2021 9:36 pm

    yes, to sell it and be rich!

    Reply
  474. Ghislain Caya

    on November 23, 2021 9:42 pm

    Yes I would

    Reply
  475. Pete

    on November 23, 2021 10:02 pm

    Yes, I would to avoid the tendency to tweak things past the point of usefulness.

    Reply
  476. Andreas Berg

    on November 23, 2021 10:16 pm

    Yes, I’m sure it’ll be a step forward for me.

    Reply
  477. Kevin Domosbian

    on November 23, 2021 11:00 pm

    Hard question honestly but today I wouldn’t

    Reply
  478. Arthur

    on November 23, 2021 11:32 pm

    No, the only thing I need is my laptop.

    Reply
  479. Michael

    on November 23, 2021 11:58 pm

    Yes I do

    Reply
  480. Anna Kowalska

    on November 24, 2021 12:13 am

    No, it might be good to sound quality, but I just don’t feel I want to make things more complex.

    Reply
  481. Nils Åkesson

    on November 24, 2021 1:36 am

    I would have loved to. I guess I would have grown a large fetish (and ‘nerdishment’) for outboard.
    But my start in the world of music production coincided with the DigiDesign/Pro Tools era.
    And my career never took me towards analog gear.
    But I would have loved to work on a big desk and a 24 track R&R – well at least a bigger set-up, than the
    Tascam 244 porta I once had ;-)
    Now all thats analog, are my mic-pre’s a couple with tubes.
    But at least I also have an analog juvel in my rack: Phonic T8300 Tube enhancer.
    Anyway – had a stroke 9 years back, so I can no longer manage anything other than digital.

    Reply
  482. Jon Drucker

    on November 24, 2021 1:58 am

    If someone were to set it up for me, and pay for all of it, and instruct me as to how everything works, then yes, sure!

    Reply
  483. rodrigo morais

    on November 24, 2021 2:06 am

    Definitivamente não

    Reply
  484. Z-Rock

    on November 24, 2021 2:19 am

    No. While the idea of an all analog studio is appealing in some ways, I am just too much of a plug-in junkie and have become too accustomed to digital recording to be willing to trade it.

    Reply
  485. Leandro Moya

    on November 24, 2021 2:50 am

    No, Hybrid system for ever.

    Reply
  486. Daniel Chin

    on November 24, 2021 4:22 am

    NO, I would rather go fully digital than fully analog! xD

    Reply
  487. Camilo

    on November 24, 2021 4:47 am

    Hmmm, no.

    Reply
  488. german

    on November 24, 2021 4:56 am

    no, por el simple hecho de que la tecnología avanza y los espacios son cada vez mas reducidos

    Reply
  489. german

    on November 24, 2021 4:58 am

    no, la practicidad ante todo!

    Reply
  490. Chris Dunnett

    on November 24, 2021 5:39 am

    No I would not. There is far too much flexibility and ease of workflow in today’s digital world. Not to mention that most plug ins emulate analog gear close enough and add great features like presets :)

    Reply
  491. Aleksei

    on November 24, 2021 6:48 am

    I think a hybrid setup is the way to go.
    Good luck to everyone!

    Reply
  492. Freddy Godoy

    on November 24, 2021 8:38 am

    I wouldn’t change it, maybe hybrid

    Reply
  493. mostafa ayman

    on November 24, 2021 9:19 am

    yes, absolutely will

    Reply
  494. Jeslan

    on November 24, 2021 9:37 am

    Maybe. Most probably hybrid instead.

    Reply
  495. Rohit Raj Raina

    on November 24, 2021 9:40 am

    I would say, a hybrid studio would be the best option. I will never transform my studio to completely analogue.

    Reply
  496. Janne

    on November 24, 2021 10:33 am

    A hybrid would be the best! The possibility to record / bounce tracks to analog and mix on the digital.

    Reply
  497. MJ

    on November 24, 2021 11:42 am

    Nope. Plugins are MANY times cheaper, considering from where I’m from.

    Reply
  498. Igor

    on November 24, 2021 12:20 pm

    Never 😊

    Reply
  499. Curtis

    on November 24, 2021 12:27 pm

    Yes way.

    Reply
  500. JaX

    on November 24, 2021 12:59 pm

    I would, but only if I could go back in time to 70s ;)

    Reply
  501. ALex

    on November 24, 2021 1:02 pm

    Probably Yes in future

    Reply
  502. Albert

    on November 24, 2021 3:34 pm

    I think no.

    Reply
  503. Jon Drucker

    on November 24, 2021 3:37 pm

    How does this set of tape machine emulations compare to IK’s own set of 4 tape machines that they already offered as a part of T-Racks, I wonder? Wondering how the performance compares for each set, and whether it’s worth it for me to spend $130 on the TEAC/Tascam set

    Reply
  504. Tracy

    on November 24, 2021 3:42 pm

    HELL no!

    Reply
  505. Richy Ross

    on November 24, 2021 5:00 pm

    No I don’t, but I love analog and digital, both twice!

    Reply
  506. Brugug

    on November 24, 2021 5:04 pm

    No, I wouldn’t. But if I had tons of money and space, I’d like to have both.

    Reply
  507. Ralf H

    on November 24, 2021 6:39 pm

    Never, I started fully digital and will keep it that way.

    Reply
  508. Tobi Ve

    on November 24, 2021 7:18 pm

    Don’t think so, my tiny apartment would not be happy. Nor would my wife. Or my cat. Well, maybe he would, and mixes could go to the unexpected.

    Reply
  509. Shebil

    on November 24, 2021 7:32 pm

    No, I won’t go fully analog

    Reply
  510. Juan Ramon Guiu

    on November 24, 2021 8:45 pm

    Si, porque no me encanta lo analogico, me encanta lo digital

    Reply
  511. samuel

    on November 24, 2021 9:10 pm

    i would absolutely not! i’d add a lot of analogness to my setup, but keeping the heart of it all digital

    Reply
  512. Paulo Matos

    on November 24, 2021 9:28 pm

    No, absolutely not!

    Reply
  513. Jordan O

    on November 24, 2021 9:54 pm

    Probably not, as digital is what I’m familiar with. I’d add outboard gear in a heartbeat, but I couldn’t get rid of my computer. Thanks for the opportunity to win one of your nice products.

    Reply
  514. Enrique

    on November 24, 2021 10:03 pm

    I’m familiar with digital, as I have used FL Studio for a while, so it would be a glaring change to analog only… Maybe just outboard gear to get to use the best of both flavors

    Reply
  515. Thennarasu

    on November 24, 2021 11:01 pm

    Nowadays digital was unavoidable. If I was in 80s, I can use only analog. But we are in 20th century, we have to accept and adopt the technology.

    Reply
  516. jim

    on November 24, 2021 11:26 pm

    No, Hybrid is the go!

    Reply
  517. olsson

    on November 24, 2021 11:42 pm

    not completely, I prefer a hybrid. Also, today it is not crazy to say that digital is similar or superior to analog in some cases

    Reply
  518. Kamau Shomari

    on November 25, 2021 12:32 am

    No chance

    Reply
  519. Jonathan

    on November 25, 2021 2:30 am

    I would definitely change it all to analogue if I could have the space (not speaking of the costs for the original instruments and gear) so basically – gimme some hundreds of thousands of dollars/euros/ pounds (I’ll take some millions of Yen too if that should be the only option) and I promise to switch all till the beginning of 2022 :)

    Reply
  520. Johnnie

    on November 25, 2021 4:46 am

    No I wouldn’t.

    Reply
  521. Genaro

    on November 25, 2021 4:47 am

    no I would not and less having accessories vst T-RackS

    Reply
  522. Ho Shui

    on November 25, 2021 6:49 am

    No, I don’t .
    moi non plus.

    Reply
  523. JimK

    on November 25, 2021 6:51 am

    Probably not.

    Reply
  524. Carlos

    on November 25, 2021 7:46 am

    La tecnología avanza a pasos agigantados el software esta casi a la par que el hardware y creo que por comodidad, espacio, costo/beneficio no lo cambiaría.

    Reply
  525. FARES

    on November 25, 2021 9:05 am

    No i don’t think the digital brings too many benefits

    Reply
  526. Dmitry

    on November 25, 2021 10:48 am

    Hm… Now sure. Maybe analog gear can became handy, so why not? So far I use mixed both: analog and digital stuff, hardware and software.

    Reply
  527. Gris

    on November 25, 2021 12:04 pm

    I dont think I would

    Reply
  528. Diego Rengifo

    on November 25, 2021 12:37 pm

    No, I would not

    Reply
  529. Patrick W.

    on November 25, 2021 1:20 pm

    Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?

    – Yes, I would :D

    Reply
  530. Haggai Rongmei

    on November 25, 2021 1:29 pm

    Nope, I’d rather stay hybrid and updated.

    Reply
  531. James Elliott

    on November 25, 2021 2:01 pm

    Yes. It would be a nice idea to break away from a screen!

    Reply
  532. Joost

    on November 25, 2021 2:04 pm

    Your question: “Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?”

    My answer: “No… I am using the good stuff that some analog gear brings and the nice benefits that digital hardware and software brings. So hybrid for me. I can’t efficiently distribute my work though analog devices either ;-)”

    Good luck all on this nice giveaway!

    Reply
  533. Jannes

    on November 25, 2021 2:13 pm

    I wouldn’t wanna work solely in a completely analog studio. I love the color and feel that you can get from analog hardware, but I also love the huge amount of possibilities, as well as the ease of use, in digital mixing.

    Reply
  534. Sarj

    on November 25, 2021 2:41 pm

    It’ll depend on the analog hardware I’ll get to work with.

    Reply
  535. Trex Themm

    on November 25, 2021 2:58 pm

    No,I wouldn’t replace it.

    Reply
  536. Andy Skinner

    on November 25, 2021 3:24 pm

    I learned on old fostex and tascam multi tracks, my daw has a few things i couldnt ever do on non digital equiptment, but if i had to go back id be happy to.

    Reply
  537. Giulio Jimenez

    on November 25, 2021 3:42 pm

    Of course I would! But only if I could bring back Bruce Swedien, Rudy Van Gelder, Al Schmitt, Tom Dowd and all of the amazing engineers that worked on the fully analog world!! But we would have to travel in time, because how could we get any work these days?

    Reply
  538. Esteban

    on November 25, 2021 3:47 pm

    Probably not. Digital technology is too convenient and makes things flow easily

    Reply
  539. Carlos Melguizo

    on November 25, 2021 5:10 pm

    Probably yes, an entirely analog studio gets you to work differently, Doing everything digitally is very convinient, but it can really affect your workflow. Plus, it would be encredibly fun to put together and to play with every single piece of gear until it breaks hehe :)

    Reply
  540. Aldair Ramos

    on November 25, 2021 5:48 pm

    Yes, of course!

    Reply
  541. Bret

    on November 25, 2021 6:01 pm

    Yes, but then I’d sell everything for a profit and go digital again

    Reply
  542. eegoal nice

    on November 25, 2021 7:17 pm

    Myabe

    Reply
  543. Andreas

    on November 25, 2021 7:29 pm

    No, would probably not

    Reply
  544. Robualdo Righetti

    on November 25, 2021 8:04 pm

    Too much money for an analog studio. I read bedroomproducersblog for free digital gear so….not interest for analog.

    Reply
  545. flatkaneda

    on November 25, 2021 8:29 pm

    Digital wins the space war, but I’d miss the sights (and smell) of the valves

    Reply
  546. Marcis

    on November 25, 2021 9:09 pm

    I would

    Reply
  547. Cool WAV

    on November 25, 2021 9:10 pm

    No I wouldn’t, but if I could have a 2nd studio setup that was fully analog that would be dope!

    Reply
  548. Estevao Christmann

    on November 25, 2021 9:53 pm

    uh, nope!

    Reply
  549. Kiran Dotson

    on November 25, 2021 11:10 pm

    Sure! Analog is cool. That’s why software trying to emulate it.

    Reply
  550. Abraham Padilla

    on November 25, 2021 11:23 pm

    I could consider that only if I had the best analog equipment, a great sounding room, a good technician and a lot of money to maintenance. But most of musicians are now working on the box so I would need a good computer, DAW and plug ins in order to get lin to them. I think right now it would be almost impossible for any studio to work exclusevly in the analog world. In fact the hibrid aproach, using good analog equiptment to record, some good processors and good plug ins and emulators will give us a very professional sound that everybody is looking for. Thanks for your effort. I value all your posts and the links to free or discounted material. Thanks for the TASCAM.

    Reply
  551. Ikechi

    on November 26, 2021 12:30 am

    Nah. I wouldn’t

    Reply
  552. Sophia

    on November 26, 2021 1:10 am

    I would if I had a space here for an analog studio setup! For now, I am going with my digital setup.

    Reply
  553. Mike

    on November 26, 2021 1:46 am

    No I won’t do that

    Reply
  554. tusca

    on November 26, 2021 1:56 am

    Totally yes! Analog gear brings all that grit, noise, distortion and misty to the circuits! Thanks!

    Reply
  555. renato

    on November 26, 2021 2:31 am

    Depende, si el cliente quiere un sonido asi, si lo haria

    Reply
  556. Davi Santos

    on November 26, 2021 2:34 am

    No!

    Reply
  557. Kendall Wilson

    on November 26, 2021 2:39 am

    No, I don’t have the room for the outboard gear.

    Reply
  558. Romeo - Israel's masked musician

    on November 26, 2021 8:41 am

    I WOULD.
    It’s all about the ear and less about how you got used to your gear. Open minded approach is a game changer. and analog is not a curse. It can FEEL wow.
    Muchas Gracias for your generous offer, IK. You may never know when it may change someone’s life.

    Reply
  559. Gabriele

    on November 26, 2021 10:30 am

    NEVAAA

    Reply
  560. Filip

    on November 26, 2021 10:47 am

    Nope!

    Reply
  561. bein

    on November 26, 2021 10:57 am

    absoutely not!

    Reply
  562. Savuon

    on November 26, 2021 11:28 am

    No, because I would need a room full of 1176s.

    Reply
  563. David

    on November 26, 2021 12:27 pm

    No. Analog gear uses too much electricity.

    Reply
  564. Praveen PA

    on November 26, 2021 1:18 pm

    No.That would be added one..

    Reply
  565. Yerko Paniagua Lobo

    on November 26, 2021 1:29 pm

    Como toda persona sin recursos para comprar algo analógico me llamaría la atención aprender de ese mundo analógico, conocer su “color y sabor”, hasta el momento será todo digital, pero seguramente debe ser toda una experiencia, sin duda.

    Reply
  566. Daniel Smith

    on November 26, 2021 1:57 pm

    I would prefer more physical than digital since I am a more hands on type of person. If I had to choose I may go with physical. As difficult as it may be it would be for the experience and authenticity of it all. I’m no purist by any means and prefer hybrid but if given the choice that’s what I would go with. Definitely more expensive but a better experience for sure. This article got me thinking too, I was about to get the wavesfactory tape plug-in but I may reconsider now!

    Reply
  567. redmoai

    on November 26, 2021 2:57 pm

    It’s fun to build such a special system!

    Reply
  568. Daniel J Fontes

    on November 26, 2021 3:39 pm

    As someone who still has a TEAC A-3340S and wouldn’t mind playing around on a 388, yes. I appreciate the sound of both recording methods. Granted, I do see the current “revival” could come to an end for the simple reason that there aren’t as many companies making the blank tape, making it FAR more expensive than it was when I was recording on my deck back in the early 90s, and replacement parts for the old machines are getting harder to come by, as I’ve heard (not to mention, I don’t know of anyone making NEW machines, or making them affordable for that matter) so I’m sure this time will come to a close. It’s too bad. I think it’s come to represent a different method of artistic expression, like filming in black and white, using vintage or boutique analog synths or virtual ones or using real film (even choosingeither 35mm or 70mm) or shootinga movie digitally, or even the choice between tube guitar amps and solid state ones. Unfortunately, with analog recording equipment there isn’t the same weight behind its use as, let’s say 35mm or 70mm film over digital.

    Reply
  569. L

    on November 26, 2021 3:45 pm

    If I had the space and the money, yes

    Reply
  570. Russ

    on November 26, 2021 4:40 pm

    would I? No, space (and cost) and reliability. In the box for me thanks!

    Reply
  571. Ronald Irawan

    on November 26, 2021 4:58 pm

    Yes, if thats an API Console

    Reply
  572. Kieran Roche

    on November 26, 2021 5:18 pm

    I wouldn’t , both Analog and digital work better together

    Reply
  573. Davis Hill

    on November 26, 2021 5:46 pm

    I would be perfectly happy to do a hybrid setup (actually that would be preferred), but I couldn’t switch to all analog. I wold miss so many things…

    Reply
  574. tonny

    on November 26, 2021 6:11 pm

    no, absolutely not

    Reply
  575. jermaine

    on November 26, 2021 6:55 pm

    normally id just say no, but this deserves a HELL NO

    Reply
  576. Brad

    on November 26, 2021 8:18 pm

    I wouldn’t

    Reply
  577. Ben

    on November 26, 2021 9:26 pm

    no way

    Reply
  578. Ariel Perez

    on November 26, 2021 9:35 pm

    I would do it…. only to bring in my digital elements. I mean… rules are meant to be broken, no?

    Reply
  579. durlok

    on November 26, 2021 9:41 pm

    There’s something about analog. I can feel it in photographs, film, music and other artforms. It’s the human touch in its most pure form, and you can’t replicate it digitally, but you can get close. Would I trade all my plugins for analog hardware? Of course. Would I stop working ITB? No, but I would try to get the best of both worlds.

    Reply
  580. ZAP

    on November 26, 2021 9:53 pm

    Only analog? No.
    Analog AND digital? Of course! ;)

    Reply
  581. Michał

    on November 26, 2021 11:12 pm

    No. I prefer the digital universe.

    Reply
  582. Claudio Arreaza

    on November 27, 2021 7:28 am

    I don’t think I would change it, but I would love to have the best of all worlds.

    Reply
  583. Simone Egidi

    on November 27, 2021 8:43 am

    No. Currently the new technology is more fast than analog technology and the sound of the new plug-ins is so good that you can substitute analog

    Reply
  584. Artur

    on November 27, 2021 8:46 am

    No I would not! Hybrid setup is the way to go!

    Reply
  585. KimchiBagels

    on November 27, 2021 9:50 am

    100% dawless setup would be loved dearly….

    but even then it’ll still find its way to the digital “realm” for some polishing and other creative touches.

    Reply
  586. Randal

    on November 27, 2021 2:25 pm

    No, certainly not but I would be happy to incorporate more analog elements into my otherwise entirely “in the box” workflow.

    Reply
  587. JORGE DANIEL ARIAS

    on November 27, 2021 4:20 pm

    No, I wouldn’t do that

    Reply
  588. Karen

    on November 27, 2021 5:08 pm

    Definitely not! But some piece of analog gear is welcome :)

    Reply
  589. Jeffreymmviii

    on November 27, 2021 6:36 pm

    Yeah im not sure. Although hardware is superior most of the time. Would love to be a proud owner of your emulation though!

    Reply
  590. Dmitrii Zakharchenko

    on November 27, 2021 7:05 pm

    I would, why not

    Reply
  591. Jamie M.

    on November 27, 2021 7:31 pm

    no, what the hell is an analog :)))

    Reply
  592. Gerardo Rojas

    on November 27, 2021 10:49 pm

    No way! I’m happy with my DAW and plugins. I don’t want consoles, racks and lots of cables. I’m satisfied with sounding just close to the real thing.

    Reply
  593. Alxander Munro

    on November 28, 2021 12:11 am

    No.Digital takes away warmth, but two inch tape in real life is a pain to edit Will always need a combination of both.

    Reply
  594. juan suarez

    on November 28, 2021 6:48 am

    Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?

    OF COURSE !!! thats my horizon right now.. i never get done with go for the another level… every day its gettin a great one with so much curiosity . But right now im going well with what i have. Just step by little step. Like a 1dB xd

    Reply
  595. David

    on November 28, 2021 8:30 am

    Although analog has a great sonic character, I would take the all digital setup. Digital is getting better and better with a sonic quality that makes the “analog sound” available to everyone. Not to mention, there are things you can do with digital that you can’t do with analog like brick wall limiting, presets, session recalls, etc.

    Reply
  596. laurent roussel

    on November 28, 2021 9:57 am

    I own some analog gears but now it’s so expensive and difficult to make them repared that now I prefer digital plugins

    Reply
  597. Silvano

    on November 28, 2021 11:43 am

    I actually woudn’t because mixing in the box is less of a hassle and can get pretty much the same results. As I’ve never tried out the T-Racks Tascam Tape plugins, I would definately give it a go and most likely would stick with it

    Reply
  598. Alfie Noakes

    on November 28, 2021 3:00 pm

    HELL no! TTC’s the way to go! 😉

    Reply
  599. Chris D

    on November 28, 2021 6:00 pm

    Would I ever substitute my digital studio for an entirely analogue one? If I had way too much money – yes! XD :’)
    In short? No. The reality is I’ll always be a poor, starving artist and the convenience and cost of ‘mixing in the box’ for me far outweighs all the problems that arise as you get more and more hardware equipment in the chain, not to mention maintenance costs. I wouldn’t be adverse to the odd hardware unit, such as a compressor/limiter or EQ on the way in. Oh and a nice keyboard synthesizer would be just perfect! :3

    Reply
  600. Andrei

    on November 28, 2021 8:25 pm

    no

    Reply
  601. Tommy T

    on November 28, 2021 8:53 pm

    Never

    Reply
  602. fruscinator

    on November 28, 2021 11:24 pm

    No i wouldnt

    Reply
  603. Al

    on November 29, 2021 12:19 am

    No I would not substitute for analog. Analog had too many issues and wasn’t fast enough. digital isn’t really expensive and reliable.

    Reply
  604. Dave Schreier

    on November 29, 2021 1:51 am

    No

    Reply
  605. Daniel Calado

    on November 29, 2021 2:26 am

    No, I wouldn’t. Tape-nursing seems like insane behavior for today’s standards. There is music to be made and life is short. But analog sound is obviously better. Good luck to everyone. Many thanks for the chance. I love IK Multimedia stuff, especially Syntronik and T-RackS.

    Reply
  606. Jerome Fernandez

    on November 29, 2021 2:28 am

    I wouldn’t even dare. The learning curve and space required would be massive.

    Reply
  607. Orderly Chaos

    on November 29, 2021 2:43 am

    01101110 01101111 00101100 00100000 01111010 01100101 01110010 01101111 01110011 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01101111 01101110 01100101 01110011 00100000 01100110 01101111 01110010 01100101 01110110 01100101 01110010

    Reply
  608. Denis

    on November 29, 2021 7:22 am

    Хочу победить!))))

    Reply
  609. .

    on November 29, 2021 11:34 am

    Yes I would.

    Some people are archivists
    Some others are consumerists

    Reply
  610. Marcin

    on November 29, 2021 12:29 pm

    yes I would – I’m almost there

    Reply
  611. Anton

    on November 29, 2021 12:45 pm

    As much as I like analog gear, I wouldn’t want to sacrifice the protability and ease of use of my digital studio.

    Reply
  612. Fabricio Trento

    on November 29, 2021 4:48 pm

    Shure I do!!

    Reply
  613. Lucky_winner

    on November 29, 2021 5:16 pm

    Yes, I would like two studios, analog and digital

    Reply
  614. Lucky_winner

    on November 29, 2021 5:17 pm

    Yes, I would like two studios, analog and digital :)

    Reply
  615. Raf Dees

    on November 29, 2021 5:33 pm

    Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?

    No space, no money, no patience, so no.

    Reply
  616. Abel

    on November 29, 2021 5:42 pm

    I wouldn’t change it, but I would work with both

    Reply
  617. Juan Salazar

    on November 29, 2021 10:49 pm

    No

    Reply
  618. Victor Vela

    on November 30, 2021 1:15 am

    No I would not

    Reply
  619. Kahlil Smith

    on November 30, 2021 4:21 am

    Nah, I wouldn’t and I couldn’t.

    Reply
  620. Jon B

    on November 30, 2021 10:31 am

    If I could afford everything analog stuff I wanted, shure.

    Reply
  621. Shawn Kimble

    on November 30, 2021 6:57 pm

    No I would not

    Reply
  622. Shaine Parr

    on December 1, 2021 1:26 pm

    I could never go all analog again. The niceties we have now are too good to give up. I still love my analog gear though!

    Reply
  623. Wilfred Buffalofondler

    on December 1, 2021 7:18 pm

    Got me a break from that analogue cake! Now give me some of that Digischnibbles!

    Reply
  624. Ivan E

    on December 1, 2021 10:17 pm

    Not. I don’t have money and space.

    Reply
    • Daniël Leeuwenberg

      on December 3, 2021 11:18 pm

      Oh yes, that is yet another not to underestimate factor, the space! I would not be able to house the analog equivalent in quality and magnitude in my two-room appartement…

      Reply
  625. RAMON ARAUJO

    on December 2, 2021 1:11 pm

    não, mas gostaria muito de ter mais equipamentos analógicos, por exemplo um maquina de fitas TASCAN.

    Reply
  626. Mike Schulz

    on December 2, 2021 4:22 pm

    No way! Keep the best of both worlds!

    Reply
  627. Shamus Izatt

    on December 2, 2021 7:33 pm

    Never say never.

    Reply
  628. Daniël Leeuwenberg

    on December 3, 2021 11:16 pm

    Actually, that is ahard question to answer, I would love to have the chance now to do some work in a fully equipped analog studio (as full as my digital one is now, with the few analog side-stuff), and I would certainly know how to handle it form experience with lesser gear many,many years ago, but it would be hard to part with all the conveniences of today’s setup: working straight on the tape-score, so to speak, doing complex edits as easily as it was back in the day only with MIDI (Steinberg 24), easier, and with audio, not having to wait for the tape to rewind all the time, all the space all those tapes took, having to keep journals of what was on wich track of the four-track and in wich generation on wich bounce (well, that of course would be of the past with a full on analog studio), etc etc etc.
    So, I guess, no. BUt I sure would like some of the gear from that studio to go with my setup… And the moderne equivalent of quality digi-gear equal to what was the standad in analog way back then – lol, come to think of it, that’s just the amazing thing, my prosumer-gear today is of near-equal quality to early seventies top of the line analog, superior in many regards. But, to get ‘that sound’, I haven’t started out on this journey all this long ago, but I’m learning fast and I must say, getting there. Still, I can’t wait to get my old tape-machine out of storage to use it as a signal processor in side-chain.

    Reply
  629. SATYABRATA

    on December 4, 2021 6:59 am

    i would love to if i had money lol, but hybrid systems are better like wavetable synthesis is digital one and i need it also combined with a modular ecosysyem would be great

    Reply
  630. Jon B

    on February 1, 2022 5:57 pm

    I didn’t win a copy so I instead went on and just bought it.

    I would say that this collection is probably the best plug-ins IK has made thus far. The 388 and Porta One are excellent for lo-fi sounds, especially for synths and drum machines. The two TEAC machines have some of the best vintage tape sounds I’ve heard. When I was demoing them when they were first released I didn’t like them that much. When I’ve used them now; however, I’ve absolutely loved them! I have owned U-he Satin for quite a while and I’ve never found any tape plug-in that has come even close to it (no, not even Softube Tape or Slate VTM), but I’m starting to think that these TEAC plug-ins are up there with Satin. They don’t have the same freedom of control over the processing happening inside of the plug-ins, but you do have control over the most important parts.

    I’ve received very positive feedback on the couple of mixes that I’ve used the TEAC plug-ins in so far. I probably wouldn’t use them a lot in mixes that call for a modern sound, but they will definitely become a mainstay in every mix that needs some vintage funkiness.

    Btw; I noticed that in your review you mentioned the EQs in the record and play section: it’s actually the tape compander (compressor/expander) section. It works a bit like a pre-emphasis/de-emphasis EQ, but instead of de-emphasizing with an EQ you do it with a expander. If you, for example, increase the highs in the record section they get more compressed at the tape stage, then you bring them back again with the expander in the play section. It sounds great!

    Reply
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest
Kitik launches FREE no frills sampler Chop Chop!
September 11, 2024
Variety of Sound releases FeenstaubTX, a FREE Transient Shaper for Windows
September 10, 2024
ToneLib Updates FREE TL TubeWarmth Overdrive
September 10, 2024
Modalics Plugin Buddy is a FREE VST3 Plugin Host
September 10, 2024
featured
How to Prepare A Song For Mixing
September 6, 2024
A Guide To Mixing Music For Music Producers
April 13, 2024
The Best FREE Drum Kits (2024)
September 1, 2024
Free Kontakt Libraries
September 6, 2024
aHow to Prepare A Song For Mixing
9 Mins Read
How to Prepare A Song For Mixing
How To Make Beats: A Quick Beat Making Guide For Beginners
10 Mins Read
Beat Making 101: How to Make a Beat for Beginners
Browse
# Music Production Software
# Free VST Plugins
# Digital Audio Workstations
# Video Editing Software
# Free Mastering Software
Download

# BPB Dirty Filter Plus
# BPB Dirty VHS
# BPB Dirty LA
# BPB Dirty Spring
# BPB Saturator

Community
# BPB on YouTube
# BPB on Facebook
# BPB on X (Twitter)
# BPB on SoundCloud
# BPB on Instagram
Subscribe
Subscribe to our mailing list to receive the latest music freeware news. We also have an RSS Feed.
Click to subscribe
© 2009 - 2024, Bedroom Producers Blog.
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.